2 Fast 2 Furious cars tested

[boyRacer]

From this month's Sport Compact Car...

Supra
Claimed:
654hp/525lb-ft
0-60: 4.5
1/4: 11.9

Actual:
0-60: 6.4
1/4: 14.5

Skyline(AWD disabled)
Claimed:
505hp/444lb-ft
0-60: 4.1
1/4: 12.1

Actual:
0-60: 6.0
1/4: 14.1

Lancer Evo
Claimed:
N/A but the stock one is a lot faster 😀
0-60: 5.2 stock
1/4: 13.4 stock

Actual:
0-60: 7.3
1/4: 15.3

RX-7
Claimed:
350hp
0-60: 4.9
1/4: 13.6

Actual:
0-60: 6.4
1/4: 14.6

S2000
Claimed:
360hp
0-60: 5.3
1/4: 13.1

Actual:
0-60: 5.7
1/4: 13.9

These cars looked like they got beat up pretty bad during the shoot since most of them are definitely down on power but those numbers are just funny considering the specs they blabber on about during the movie. 😀

Pic 😛

 

[SyahM]

hahahha . that's funny. But hey, in the movie they all look like they're as fast as bullet!

 

[bolido2000]

Those cars were modded for show, not performance

 

[KokomoGST]

Well, down on power or not... when you add that much rice to a car, it doesn't make it faster. I highly doubt they make that much on a chassis dyno and all the added weight of the ricer-roni makes it even more the more rice.

My POS is faster than nearly every single car...

 

[boyRacer]

Originally posted by: bolido2000
Those cars were modded for show, not performance

Oh i know... i just find it funny that everyone in the theater is gonna drop their jaws because they all look so fast... even with all the eye candy. 🙂 BTW... the Supra actually has a Greddy single turbo setup... so its not really stock but i don't know what kind of abuse it went through. 🙁

 

[DanFungus]

hahaha, nice pic 😀

 

[KhoiFather]

Oh give it a break. You think if they didn't do those type of things, the movie will be worth watching? Plus, I don't think a car with over 500 hp is going to do uhhh 14 seconds in a quarter mile? Unless that driver don't know what the hell he's doing. A Skyline does like less around 13-14 seconds stock, and so does a stock Twin Turbo Supra. So I don't get that actual specs part.

 

[Cycad]

Atleast the S2000 is pretty close. I like the look of those cars, stock of course not riced.

 

[slikmunks]

that is a SH!TTY time for an fd rx7... that's higher than stock times... hell, i could prob'ly run a 14.6 in my little n/a 2nd gen wtf!?

 

[abaez]

ROFL at pic

 

[BaliBabyDoc]

They needed Vin Diesel to tell them to double clutch.

S2000 holds up well b/c you really have to know how to drive in order to abuse it.

 

[Nocturnal]

PLEASE INCLUDE A SPOILER IN YOUR THREAD TITLE.

WHERE DID HE SPOIL IT? WHEN HE SAID THE TIMES OF THE CARS IN THE 2FAST 2FURIOUS.

 

[snik]

Does anyone watch Car and Driver on TNN? They also tested the cars and had similar results.

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: bolido2000
Those cars were modded for show, not performance

yup, they made the skyline a rwd instead of awd cuz a totally grippy stable car isn't kewl to film u know 🙂

 

[CubicZirconia]

They needed Vin Diesel to tell them to double clutch.

Gotta love bashing the fast and the furious. It just doesn't get old.

 

[ElFenix]

the cars have flames coming out the back thats gotta make em like 2 seconds faster!

 

[erikiksaz]

The times seem to be kinda slow... or is it just me?

 

[KhoiFather]

I know for a fact those cars aren't that slow.

 

[Imported]

Originally posted by: erikiksaz
The times seem to be kinda slow... or is it just me?

They seem slow to me.. the RX-7, Evo, and Skyline look way off.. according to those numbers, my Civic is faster than that Evo, which I highly doubt..

 

[isekii]

The driver sucks ass literally

a 600HP supra pulling a 14.5 ?

an 5 Speed IS300 pulls 14.9 bone stock. 2JZ-GE (N/A) Supra engine. 215hp/200ish torque at 3300lbs

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Originally posted by: isekii
The driver sucks ass literally

a 600HP supra pulling a 14.5 ?

an 5 Speed IS300 pulls 14.9 bone stock. 2JZ-GE (N/A) Supra engine. 215hp/200ish torque at 3300lbs

The car doesn't really have 600hp.

 

[oldirtythao]

Originally posted by: boyRacer
From this month's Sport Compact Car...
Lancer Evo
Claimed:
N/A but the stock one is a lot faster 😀
0-60: 5.2 stock
1/4: 13.4 stock

Wow, N/A EVO? isn't that just a regular lancer then? i always thought if a lancer was an EVO, it would be turbo-ed awd....

 

[geno]

whoever was driving needs to do a little better...

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: oldirtythao

Originally posted by: boyRacer
From this month's Sport Compact Car...
Lancer Evo
Claimed:
N/A but the stock one is a lot faster 😀
0-60: 5.2 stock
1/4: 13.4 stock

Wow, N/A EVO? isn't that just a regular lancer then? i always thought if a lancer was an EVO, it would be turbo-ed awd....

I think he meant "N/A" as in "there was no time claimed" 🙂

 

[oldirtythao]

I think he meant "N/A" as in "there was no time claimed" 🙂

😛 i guess i was so quick to judge this movie haha