2 Boston men urinate on, beat & call man "Illegal Immigrant" in Trump inspired attack

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,896
7,922
136
Hitler also never officially said "Kill the Jews!" (or the homeless, or mentally sick people, immigrants etc.)

Hey, this guy gets it!
Trump is a strongman because our political system has failed. Both parties' leaders work towards the same objectives and both have betrayed the American people on Immigration.

Bush and McCain fought hard for Amnesty last decade. Obama has practically implemented it this decade. The American voters now have to go to the extreme if they care about an illegal foreign invasion in their country. Thus a man like Trump is realized.

That's the risk our system takes when it ceases to function and voter approval is down the toilet. There's a high price for failure, and Trump is that price.
 

Black Octagon

Golden Member
Dec 10, 2012
1,410
2
81
These brothers sounds like a couple of despicable cowards. I don't like Trump, personally, but these guys and these guys alone are responsible for their actions.

Taking the law into your own hands in this way is an illegal act, and doing so to commit violence against a vulnerable person is immoral.

May the "justice" system live up to its name and process these guys with all due haste.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,600
4,698
136
Seriously? The state of the country is because of bad governance, not Fox, Faux, or whatever you want to call it.

The state of the country is because of poorly informed voters.

That is absolutely not the fault of Fox News, amirite?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Give me the 5 bucks you owe me.

-John
You clearly don't understand how debt works. If he actually owed you 5 bucks, that would be your problem, not his. It would only be his problem if he wanted to borrow more from you in the future.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,595
4,666
136
Yes if Hillary said that person is a problem and we need to eliminate the problem. Then you go and kill that someone based on her provocation that you normally wouldn't have.

You are an Idiot. Eliminate doesn't equal Kill.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,078
136
If thats all it takes to get someone to commit assault and battery, then I dont think they were exactly intelligent, peace-loving individuals to begin with.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
You are an Idiot. Eliminate doesn't equal Kill.

Yeah, but I learned the hard way that most people don't make the distinction between the two, so be careful how you use it.

[NOT discussing moderator actions.]
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
eliminate

[ih-lim-uh-neyt]
Examples
verb (used with object), eliminated, eliminating.

1. to remove or get rid of, especially as being in some way undesirable: to eliminate risks; to eliminate hunger.
Synonyms: do away with, banish, abolish, eradicate, erase, exterminate, cut out, annihilate, weed out, stamp out, rub out.
Antonyms: obtain, get, invite.

2. to omit, especially as being unimportant or irrelevant; leave out: I have eliminated all statistical tables, which are of interest only to the specialist.
Synonyms: throw out, exclude, drop, delete, except.
Antonyms: include, accept, admit, incorporate.

3. to remove from further consideration or competition, especially by defeating in a contest.

4. to eradicate or kill: to eliminate the enemy.

5. Physiology. to void or expel from an organism.

6. Mathematics. to remove (a quantity) from an equation by elimination.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Seriously? The state of the country is because of bad governance, not Fox, Faux, or whatever you want to call it. Did you learn that from your Pappy and Mum, or are you just another stupid narrative following fuck? Eat a back of dicks!

Well thought-out argument. Bravo. I can see why you're an "elite member.":thumbsup:

\keep consuming your tail, Ouroboros.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
eliminate

[ih-lim-uh-neyt]
Examples
verb (used with object), eliminated, eliminating.

1. to remove or get rid of, especially as being in some way undesirable: to eliminate risks; to eliminate hunger.
Synonyms: do away with, banish, abolish, eradicate, erase, exterminate, cut out, annihilate, weed out, stamp out, rub out.
Antonyms: obtain, get, invite.

2. to omit, especially as being unimportant or irrelevant; leave out: I have eliminated all statistical tables, which are of interest only to the specialist.
Synonyms: throw out, exclude, drop, delete, except.
Antonyms: include, accept, admit, incorporate.

3. to remove from further consideration or competition, especially by defeating in a contest.

4. to eradicate or kill: to eliminate the enemy.

5. Physiology. to void or expel from an organism.

6. Mathematics. to remove (a quantity) from an equation by elimination.

Just because it sometimes CAN equate, doesn't mean it ALWAYS does.

Also, to eliminate a problem does NOT require the termination of the people causing the problem.

That said, at least you put in a good effort rather than single-picture-mockery. :thumbsup:
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
Ok, so we round all those millions of illegals and put there where? Oh that's right, in camps. And then we go to deport them back their home countries but their home countries won't take them back. So then we go to war with Mexico and Honduras to force them to take them back or...
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,595
4,666
136
eliminate

[ih-lim-uh-neyt]
Examples
verb (used with object), eliminated, eliminating.

1. to remove or get rid of, especially as being in some way undesirable: to eliminate risks; to eliminate hunger.
Synonyms: do away with, banish, abolish, eradicate, erase, exterminate, cut out, annihilate, weed out, stamp out, rub out.
Antonyms: obtain, get, invite.

2. to omit, especially as being unimportant or irrelevant; leave out: I have eliminated all statistical tables, which are of interest only to the specialist.
Synonyms: throw out, exclude, drop, delete, except.
Antonyms: include, accept, admit, incorporate.

3. to remove from further consideration or competition, especially by defeating in a contest.

4. to eradicate or kill: to eliminate the enemy.

5. Physiology. to void or expel from an organism.

6. Mathematics. to remove (a quantity) from an equation by elimination.

This is your argument?

Semantics and context ...
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,553
7,978
136
This is your argument?

Semantics and context ...

If the simple definition of a word is not the definition of a word, then you're not capable of comprehending the language of English. You're speaking the language of the mentally retarded.

I refuse to discuss an iota with a person who doesn't speak english, only mentally retarded.

My ignore list finally has my first person, you!
 

JockoJohnson

Golden Member
May 20, 2009
1,417
60
91
If the simple definition of a word is not the definition of a word, then you're not capable of comprehending the language of English. You're speaking the language of the mentally retarded.

I refuse to discuss an iota with a person who doesn't speak english, only mentally retarded.

My ignore list finally has my first person, you!

Really? I would go with definition #1 of eliminate if you put it in context. However, a certain few people here and those two jackass brothers are saying he meant definition #4. Way to go retards, you have the same mentality as those two scumbag brothers.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,553
7,978
136
Then what's the difference between forced busing, states rights and between just saying the N-word?

Let me explain.

The late, Reagan campaign consultant Lee Atwater explained how candidates can win the vote of racists without sounding racist themselves:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”

That is exactly how eliminate equals something else besides just #1 in the dictionary in the minds of xenophobes.

Now Trump is saying he will not participate in the next debate unless he is given 20 million dollars that he will "donate to charity." It's basically pan handling for a higher level.. but obviously not in the minds of those who don't comprehend english or narcissism.
 
Last edited:

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
Hey, this guy gets it!
Trump is a strongman because our political system has failed. Both parties' leaders work towards the same objectives and both have betrayed the American people on Immigration.

Bush and McCain fought hard for Amnesty last decade. Obama has practically implemented it this decade. The American voters now have to go to the extreme if they care about an illegal foreign invasion in their country. Thus a man like Trump is realized.

That's the risk our system takes when it ceases to function and voter approval is down the toilet. There's a high price for failure, and Trump is that price.

LoL, technically the Whites who wiped out the native population and despoiled a pristine wilderness were an illegal foreign invasion. Might makes right. If Whites lack the power to stop the Latino invasion, then it is ok. When the Latinos eventually have the power, I am sure they will attempt to stop immigrants of other heritages from immigrating.

In Mexico, they are pissed off by all the immigrants coming from poorer Latin/South American countries. Poor people appear to be persona non grata in every country.

Me, I am not too worried about it right now. When they start rounding up whites in extermination camps, then I will sit up and take notice.
 

JockoJohnson

Golden Member
May 20, 2009
1,417
60
91
Then what's the difference between forced busing, states rights and between just saying the N-word?

Let me explain.

The late, Reagan campaign consultant Lee Atwater explained how candidates can win the vote of racists without sounding racist themselves:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”

That is exactly how eliminate equals something else besides just #1 in the dictionary in the minds of xenophobes.

Now Trump is saying he will not participate in the next debate unless he is given 20 million dollars that he will "donate to charity." It's basically pan handling for a higher level.. but obviously not in the minds of those who don't comprehend english or narcissism.

Since we are doing definitions, where does it say that a xenophobe is someone who does not like illegal immigrants but welcomes legal immigrants?

Definition of XENOPHOBE


: one unduly fearful of what is foreign and especially of people of foreign origin


I think it should be called common sense. How is it even a remotely good idea to let people flood into this country without knowing who they are or where they are? I am completely fine with increasing our immigration limit per year instead of just letting undocumented people either overstay their visas and have to hide or allow people to cross the borders unfettered.

I think the crux of the issue here is: Do you think that all people who do not want illegal immigration are also against legal immigration? It sounds like it. You and others lump legal and illegal into the same status and thus, anyone who does not welcome illegal immigrants must hate all immigrants.

Edit: I should add that I am assuming that most of those AGAINST illegal immigration are FOR legal immigration. If they aren't, then yes, they are xenophobes....by the very definition of the word.
 
Last edited:

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
11,553
7,978
136
Since we are doing definitions, where does it say that a xenophobe is someone who does not like illegal immigrants but welcomes legal immigrants?

Definition of XENOPHOBE


: one unduly fearful of what is foreign and especially of people of foreign origin


I think it should be called common sense. How is it even a remotely good idea to let people flood into this country without knowing who they are or where they are? I am completely fine with increasing our immigration limit per year instead of just letting undocumented people either overstay their visas and have to hide or allow people to cross the borders unfettered.

I think the crux of the issue here is: Do you think that all people who do not want illegal immigration are also against legal immigration? It sounds like it. You and others lump legal and illegal into the same status and thus, anyone who does not welcome illegal immigrants must hate all immigrants. That is one big assumption (if I am correct). And assumption is the mother of all fuckups...and just plain ignorant.

Actually that's quite an assumption and a wrong one at that that all are like you who want legal immigration and not illegal immigration.

Because I know from experience in in New York upscale scene, Russian blondes who were illegal and wanted green cards from sugar daddies were often trophy mistress material and "desired" in the Wall Street work place, where as Indian women who had legal status and university degrees were often "talked down to" like this is exactly what I heard amongst co-workers: "OMG I can't believed you hired that Indian chick for your firm, they smell like curry." "I had to show diversity hiring and she's got a degree from Yale." "Still could have consulted me first.."

I wish things like that didn't exist but they do.. and it's basically the same 100 year old "Irish need not apply". We want legal immigration of scandinivans, germans, english but not Irish. As you can see the purity stance does not end there unfortunately. It's well and alive 100 years later.

And regarding the filling up blindly and letting possible terrorists/ mafia and drug cartels.. I agree we need to police the borders. However this fear is exploited by the right to say we're not doing anything against the problem. The USCIS has a quota of how many green cards are handed out each year.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Most all legal immigrants I know do not support illegal immigration, does that make them xenophobes as well??? Many of these people had to wait 5 to 7 years until they were granted immigration visas. Many of these think illegals should go back to their country of origin and go through the process like they did.

All legal immigrant must go through DHS/FBI background checks as part of the process. This even includes infants.