1995 mazda b2300 se pickup 3.0 v6

Status
Not open for further replies.

xaeniac

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,641
14
81
Looked @ a '95 mazda b2300 3.0 v6. 5 speed broken A/C and broken gas gauge. Owner claims she does not know what is wrong with A/C. Truck has 150,000 miles, but engine was rebuilt ~ 30,000 miles ago. Should i pull the trigger @ $1500. This is the least she will take for it? I have an 01 Focus with 120,000 and was going to buy this as a backup/ when I needed a truck. Don't know if it's worth this though due to a lot of unknowns.
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,015
114
106
Its a $1500 truck. They really don't get much cheaper than that for the year miles. No matter what you go for at $1500 there are going to be unknowns. Rangers which is what that is are pretty good little trucks. The rebuilt engine would bother me a bit but its lived for 30k miles already so whoever rebuilt it had to have been at least somewhat competent.

4x4?
 

xaeniac

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,641
14
81
No 2 wheel drive

I really don't need it and the only reason why I am considering it is because it's cheap. It's a clean little truck but the A/C not working sucks otherwise it would be a no brainer. This truck could be awesome or it could be a headache. If I needed transportation I would get it but my car is running good and I am starting to lean towards not getting it.
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,015
114
106
a/c could cost you as little as $15 to fix if all it is low on 134a coolant as long as it isn't a big leak.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
I bought a van that had AC that didn't work. It turns out that the fill valve was bad. A new valve core and some R134a and it was good to go. Total cost to me, $35. I think the previous owner just figured AC problem = expensive and was scared to take it in.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
22
81
The 3.0 litre V6, while plenty reliable, is not a really desirable engine. It does not have appreciably more power than the 2.3 litre 4-cylinder, while having no better fuel economy than the 4.0 litre V6. It basically has the fuel economy of a V6 and the power of an I4; that is to say, it has it backwards.

It's a solid and reliable engine though; there are just better options from a fuel economy and power standpoint.

ZV
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The 3.0 litre V6, while plenty reliable, is not a really desirable engine. It does not have appreciably more power than the 2.3 litre 4-cylinder, while having no better fuel economy than the 4.0 litre V6. It basically has the fuel economy of a V6 and the power of an I4; that is to say, it has it backwards.

It's a solid and reliable engine though; there are just better options from a fuel economy and power standpoint.

ZV

Yes, but if this is just going to be a truck for occasional use I would say he should grab any good deal he can find on a reliable truck. If he's putting only 1-2k miles on it a year the gas costs aren't going to be terribly high.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
22
81
Originally posted by: Bignate603
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The 3.0 litre V6, while plenty reliable, is not a really desirable engine. It does not have appreciably more power than the 2.3 litre 4-cylinder, while having no better fuel economy than the 4.0 litre V6. It basically has the fuel economy of a V6 and the power of an I4; that is to say, it has it backwards.

It's a solid and reliable engine though; there are just better options from a fuel economy and power standpoint.

ZV

Yes, but if this is just going to be a truck for occasional use I would say he should grab any good deal he can find on a reliable truck. If he's putting only 1-2k miles on it a year the gas costs aren't going to be terribly high.

True, but there shouldn't be much increase in cost for a 4.0 truck in similar condition, especially if he's looking into beaters. Since he doesn't need the truck for transportation, he can afford to wait a while to find a truck with the 4.0 which will give him more flexibility on the occasions when he does need a truck.

ZV
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
That wasn't just an engine rebuild, it was a motor swap. The B2300 came with the 2.3L I4, the B3000 was the 3.0 V6, and the B4000 was the 4.0 V6.

ZV is right, you could wait a bit and find something else that's not as questionable.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
I've owned the 2.4, 3.0 & 4.0 liter engines in Rangers, I'd look a bit longer, or consider renting a truck when you need one.

Arkaign is correct, the 2300 correlates with the engine size, and it now has a different engine that it shipped from the factory with. I'd take a pass for that alone.

As far as the whole backup vehicle goes, cash in the bank goes a long ways towards a different car or a rental if you need one. TTL, registration and insurance are really a fools game for owning a 2nd car nowdays.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,512
22
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
I've owned the 2.4, 3.0 & 4.0 liter engines in Rangers, I'd look a bit longer, or consider renting a truck when you need one.

Arkaign is correct, the 2300 correlates with the engine size, and it now has a different engine that it shipped from the factory with. I'd take a pass for that alone.

As far as the whole backup vehicle goes, cash in the bank goes a long ways towards a different car or a rental if you need one. TTL, registration and insurance are really a fools game for owning a 2nd car nowdays.

TTL for a Ranger like the OP is looking at would be less than one week's car rental through a place like Hertz. The difference is that by owning the truck, he can use it at his own convenience; no drop-off times to worry about, no worries about putting a dent in it, no need to make a reservation in advance, etc.

The convenience factor of having a second vehicle is huge.

ZV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.