176 reason why Trump shouldn't be president.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
ROFL, this clown's right on time to help Trump secure the White House.
Republicans lose regardless of whether or not Trump wins. His policy proposals are all disastrous and costly. The question is whether or not they're smart enough to cut their losses now or face total disaster in 4 years.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Republicans lose regardless of whether or not Trump wins. His policy proposals are all disastrous and costly. The question is whether or not they're smart enough to cut their losses now or face total disaster in 4 years.

Trump is with them where it matters- tax cuts for the financial elite, deregulated finance, ending the ACA. They'd make lemonade out of lemons given the chance.

Trump's ongoing lies have rendered us numb-

http://www.vox.com/2016/9/12/12887522/donald-trump-interview-shocking-numbb
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
The Republican party has actually nominated for president a man who attacked the Pope.

Pope started it, fuck him. Care-o-meter: 0/10.

Who attacked John McCain for being captured by the North Vietnamese.

Shows his ego and lack of tact, overall don't care much, 3/10.

Who attacked Gold Star parents Khizr and Ghazala Khan and then juxtaposed their names with the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorism."

Shows he has a really big ego and is an idiot, 7/10 for that part. The second link doesn't say anything about "radical Islamic terrorism" though.

Who attacked Hillary Clinton as a "bigot." Who attacked her as "brainwashed." As "unhinged." As "a monster." As "the devil." As "the most corrupt candidate ever"—showing her face on piles of hundred-dollar bills and the Star of David.

Wow, literally what everyone does to him, combined with unending pulling of the Holocard. 0/10.

Who attacked her as someone whom "Second Amendment people" should do something about. As someone whose religion "we don't know anything about"—after he explained he had never asked God for forgiveness.

The second amendment bit was really stupid, I'll give that one an 8/10. Second one is a non-issue, 0/10.

Who attacked President Obama and implied he was a traitor. Who attacked him as having been complicit in the Orlando terrorist attack. Who attacked him for having lower approval ratings than Vladimir Putin, as if Putin's could be trusted. Who attacked him as being born in another country. Who attacked him as the founder of ISIS, then said it was sarcasm, then said it wasn't sarcasm, then attacked him again as the founder of ISIS.

Link does not include the word "traitor", and political people do this kind of stuff all the time. 0/10. He should get off of the Kenyan Muslim thing, makes him look really dumb, 6/10. Putin thing makes him look boneheaded too, not sure if this list is going to include his comments about Tienanmen Square and others, but yeah he should stop worshiping authoritarians. 8/10. The founder of ISIS thing was retarded too, 7/10.

Who attacked Carly Fiorina for her face; Hillary Clinton for her non-presidential "look"; Heidi Cruz for her appearance; Megyn Kelly for having "blood coming out of her wherever"; Mika Brzezinski as "crazy and very dumb," "neurotic," "not very bright."

Muh soginy. 0/10.

Who attacked the women who accused Roger Ailes of harassment.

Should have kept his mouth shut, no common sense. 7/10.

Who attacked the women who choose abortion—and said there should be punishments.

Yeah this one was just a disaster. Moron caught mid-flop and not knowing where to land. 10/10.

Who attacked a New York Times reporter because he had a condition that made his arms look atypical; who attacked Judge Gonzalo Curiel because he was of Mexican descent; who attacked Senator Elizabeth Warren over allegedly lying about her heritage to get into Harvard when she never went to Harvard; who attacked Senator Jeff Flake by saying he won't be re-elected this year, when he isn't up for election until 2018.

Relatively minor banter with a little bit of ignorance. 2/10.

The Republican Party has actually nominated for president a man who attacked U.S. troops in Iraq and claimed they stole millions; who has attacked Ted Cruz's father and claimed he was connected to the assassination of President Kennedy; attacked Bill Clinton and claimed he was a rapist.

A quick Google provides stories of soldiers stealing money in Iraq in Afghanistan, so he was right here. The Ted Cruz thing is just hilarious banter. Bill Clinton is pretty damn scummy. 0/10.

Who attacked Mexicans as rapists, bringing drugs and crime; who attacked African-Americans and claimed they were all living in poverty with no jobs and schools that were no good; who attacked Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as a "war zone" and attacked the United States of America and claimed it is in a "death spiral."

Unlike Hillary, who accused the Mexican government of sending over people to bring drugs (albeit not rape) and wanted to build physical barriers. 0/10. The other points are the usual hyperbole he uses, and things leftists frequently use to rile up their favored demographics. 0/10.

The Republican Party has actually nominated for president a man who lied about opposing the war in Iraq, when there is a tape of him supporting it. A tape recorded on the first anniversary of 9/11…

Who lied about opposing the war in Iraq during a speech in which he insisted, "I will never lie to you."

Not great but typical, nothing special about Trump. 3/10.

Who lied about six million dollars in charitable donations to veterans’ groups from his telethon; who lied about donating his profits from The Apprentice, about charitable donations from The Celebrity Apprentice, and from "Trump the Game" to St. Jude Cancer Center.

Yeah he's scum and corrupt. 8/10.

Who lied about a plan to debate Bernie Sanders for charity.

It was probably dumb of him to back out of this one, especially when he made a piss-poor attempt of wooing Bernie fans after Clinton won. Not really a reason not to vote for him though. 3/10.

OK 176 is a bigger number than I thought, bored here. There are definitely some valid ones in here, also a lot of meaningless crap. I bet the overall count is closer to 76 reasons not to vote for him.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
If only the US wasn't in effect a 2-party system, then there might still be a small chance of a halfway decent outcome. Clinton is nothing but a puppet for a select few big companies, and Trump is as dangerous as Putin, Al-Baghdadi, Kim Jong-un or Nethanyahu, but even more retarded than any of them.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,617
33,336
136
If only the US wasn't in effect a 2-party system, then there might still be a small chance of a halfway decent outcome. Clinton is nothing but a puppet for a select few big companies, and Trump is as dangerous as Putin, Al-Baghdadi, Kim Jong-un or Nethanyahu, but even more retarded than any of them.
Of course there is no evidence proving the bolded but she's a liberal so guilty until proven innocent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Reason #177: Flint MI is the template for the new democrat-run America. Trump is in the way. He must go. How dare he remind voters that Flint used to build stuff.
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
Of course there is no evidence proving the bolded but she's a liberal so guilty until proven innocent.

The Democrats are only left or liberal to US standards. I'm quite left for Euro standards. US politics in general is in the pocket of all the big companies, even more so than most of the parties here.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Reason #177: Flint MI is the template for the new democrat-run America. Trump is in the way. He must go. How dare he remind voters that Flint used to build stuff.
Actually, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Denver, and other thriving cities built on the high-tech economy are the template for the new America. And yes, they are building stuff.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
OK 176 is a bigger number than I thought, bored here. There are definitely some valid ones in here, also a lot of meaningless crap. I bet the overall count is closer to 76 reasons not to vote for him.

Numb to the lies, right?
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,580
12,680
136
Well, yeh, but Hilllary's the liar. About everything.
No list with Olberman either.
Actually, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Denver, and other thriving cities built on the high-tech economy are the template for the new America. And yes, they are building stuff.
And they are all....wait for it....liberal dominated.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Reason 177, he lies about his weight and BP meds. No way is this guy 236 pounds, he is clearly north of 250.... And at 70 years old his paid shill doctor claims he is NOT on BP meds but has a perfect blood pressure. Yep. Sure. The screaming carrot demon tells no truths...
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
So are Detroit, Baltimore, and Cleveland, but let's not talk about those :)

Yep. It's the migration of the predatory jerb creators. After they beat the cash out of an area, they move on to new territory. When the cost of maintenance gets bigger than the cost of moving on, they'll do it again.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I keep wondering why this thread jumps all over the place whenever I load it myself.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Yes it's CRAZY, my cyberfox goes nuts in this thread.....SEIZURES:....