Question 16GB Optane NVMe w/ SATA SSD?

jrichrds

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,522
0
76
I have a system that came with 16GB Optane NVMe and I've put in a 500GB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD that I already had. Has anyone done this just because they had the spare parts on hand? Am i better off using the Optane for caching, or is it pointless?

I know the Optane NVMe itself will have better read speeds and random read performance than the SATA SSD, but worse write speed performance. I thought Optane is a read-only cache when enabled, but I noticed the write speeds drop to Optane levels as well when running CrystalDiskMark.
 

killster1

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
5,201
222
106
I have a system that came with 16GB Optane NVMe and I've put in a 500GB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD that I already had. Has anyone done this just because they had the spare parts on hand? Am i better off using the Optane for caching, or is it pointless?

I know the Optane NVMe itself will have better read speeds and random read performance than the SATA SSD, but worse write speed performance. I thought Optane is a read-only cache when enabled, but I noticed the write speeds drop to Optane levels as well when running CrystalDiskMark.
yes use it to cache the ssd, you cant install anything to a 16gb drive anyway to small and slow.
 

NewMaxx

Member
Aug 11, 2007
189
10
81
Optane has excellent latency and great low queue depth performance, both most important for consumer usage. It's likely still worth using even for a SATA SSD but by all means optional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makaveli

aigomorla

Cases and Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
17,874
767
126
As others said use it to cache for now, and later when NVMe's drop grab a bigger one, and recycle the 500gb to game folder drive.
It wont be super noticeably faster, but it will be faster because optane has a lot better latency, and access times.
 

jrichrds

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,522
0
76
Optane has excellent latency and great low queue depth performance, both most important for consumer usage. It's likely still worth using even for a SATA SSD but by all means optional.
The read benefits are undeniable, but I'm wondering if it's really slowing down writes (takes the sequential write benchmark score of the SATA SSD from 550MB/s to 150MB/s when Optane is enabled) as the Optane's write speeds are slow - I assume because it was never meant to speed up writes, but just didn't expect it to affect write speeds at all as it's meant as a read cache.
 

NewMaxx

Member
Aug 11, 2007
189
10
81
Yes, it has slower sequential writes. I have similar setups around here and what I do is manual tiering (Storage Spaces) where I limit the size of the write cache so it's still an improvement for small writes but doesn't hinder large writes. If that makes sense. Although typically if it's your OS drive and only drive, you won't be doing sustained writes at any high speed, but I digress. Optane would be better used for a HDD of course. Unfortunately with how Optane works, I don't think you can exclusively use it as a read cache, at least not as configured via BIOS. But if it's your OS drive that would be the primary way of coupling it - otherwise you'd have to use caching software like PrimoCache.
 
Last edited:

ASK THE COMMUNITY