- Aug 29, 2004
- 286
- 0
- 0
Morning All,
When I select a 16:9 resolution, either from Windows' Display Properties or in using PowerStrip, the displayed results are not what I expect at all. What I expect is a 16:9 image contained within the 4:3 physical screen of my monitor. Instead, what I get as a result is what appears to be a 3:4 image contained with 4:3 physical screen of my monitor.
The most common 16:9 resolution I am trying to achieve is 1280x720, but there are plent of others (1600x900, 1024x576, 960x540, and 853x480 to name a few). I have tried this using NVidia Ti4200 Ultra650 (AGP), NVidia PCX5300 (PCI Express), and ATI AnW 7500 (PCI) video cards, and also on ViewSonic A70f and PS790 Professional Series CRT monitors, and a Dell FP1800 UltraSharp LCD monitor. All yield the same results.
For those that have been able to properly display 16x9 resolutions, can you state what video card, operating system, driver, associated software, and monitor that was used in your seccess story?
When I select a 16:9 resolution, either from Windows' Display Properties or in using PowerStrip, the displayed results are not what I expect at all. What I expect is a 16:9 image contained within the 4:3 physical screen of my monitor. Instead, what I get as a result is what appears to be a 3:4 image contained with 4:3 physical screen of my monitor.
The most common 16:9 resolution I am trying to achieve is 1280x720, but there are plent of others (1600x900, 1024x576, 960x540, and 853x480 to name a few). I have tried this using NVidia Ti4200 Ultra650 (AGP), NVidia PCX5300 (PCI Express), and ATI AnW 7500 (PCI) video cards, and also on ViewSonic A70f and PS790 Professional Series CRT monitors, and a Dell FP1800 UltraSharp LCD monitor. All yield the same results.
For those that have been able to properly display 16x9 resolutions, can you state what video card, operating system, driver, associated software, and monitor that was used in your seccess story?