15 year old shot and killed

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

idiotekniQues

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2007
2,572
0
76
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues

if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.

you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.

if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.

we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.


How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?

how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?

or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?

considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
One less piece of trash to worry about. too bad the guy didn't kill the others.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: crt1530
Gun supporters said the weapon saved Wells' life. Opponents said it took Buford's - that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed.

His cousin, Tameka Foster, 21, questioned why police did not punish Buford's shooter.

"They let that man run out freely," Foster said. "My cousin is dead."

Yeah, and if the 15-year-old wasn't ILLEGALLY armed, the situation would've been averted entirely. By the way, I hate pulling the race card, but it says that the kid's cousin's name was Tameka. I don't know any white girls named Tameka. BTW, your cousin is dead because he pulled a weapon on the wrong fooking person, he should've thought twice before deciding to commit armed robbery. Assclown was already in trouble for other robberies, it really is beyond me how anyone could knowingly defend him now that he's dead.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Not much I can say that hasn't already been said.

I think if the police aren't going to guarantee protection of this mans life and property now, he should be allowed a belt fed machine gun to hold off the mobs that will be trying to get revenge by either burning his house down or killing him.

Nobody should ever be forced to retreat from their own home. Especially by stupid people. I have ZERO sympathy for st00pid people, and that includes myself from time to time.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Submitting this to DarwinAwards.com right now, maybe this kid can get honoured in this year's Stupid Criminals section. I wonder if I can send Damon a thank-you card care of the local precinct for taking one more waste of skin off this planet?

Sadly, as exdeath said, this guy is probably going to have to relocate to avoid harassment/injury/death.

- M4H
 

yuppiejr

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2002
1,317
0
0
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues

if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.

you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.

if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.

we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.

How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?

how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?

or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?

considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.

Why is it the commie-lefto geeks always sweep in defending the criminals in the gun debate rather than looking to do something constructive like enforce existing laws? In the case of your argument, it's somehow a gun-owner's fault if someone ILLEGALLY breaks into their home/vehicle and steals their property?

By your logic, if someone steals or borrows your car then proceeds to get drunk and kill a pedestrian we should throw you, the owner of the car, in jail with the person who stole/borrowed it and killed someone. Your "arrest the gun owner" idea reeks of the same level of idiocy.
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
I don't see anything wrong with the family mourning the kid's death or putting up a memorial. Losing a family member is a traumatic thing.

What is completely indefensible is claiming the homeowner did anything wrong, or trying to excuse the dead teen's actions. What would impress me is if at the boy's funeral (which I'm sure will be jam-packed with his peers) someone would stand up and say how the boy's death was his own fault and anyone sitting there who thinks otherwise is deluded.

 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Originally posted by: leftyman
Originally posted by: BKLounger
let me just make sure i am crystal here. A 15 year old pulls a gun on a person then the other person responds by shooting a weapon (which he had concealed and a permit for) and people are on the side of the 15 year old?

Am i correct in this? who in the world can actually be on the side of the 15 year old with an illegal fire arm who pulled his weapon first?

people of similar morals and make up.

But won't you please think of the children. ;) :roll:
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Originally posted by: rivan
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: pontifex
you have to love how everyone completely ignores the fact that the kid pulled a gun on the guy in an attempt to rob him...its all about the guy who shot him and how much a an animal and criminal he is.
Nobody is ignoring that. Why else would it be ruled a justified shooting?

his family and the opponents of the ruling...

Something similar has happened here - a kid (18 at the time, I think) kills a cop and his family and others are outraged that he has to face any consequences. There have been "Free Kevin Johnson" t-shirts and "No Tears for McEntee" graffiti.

It's complete crap. I don't understand why people can't accept responsibility for their actions. You pull a gun, expect a violent situation. You kill a cop - complete with witnesses, expect consequences.

No one takes responsibility for anything nowadays.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Originally posted by: yuppiejr
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues

if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.

you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.

if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.

we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.

How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?

how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?

or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?

considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.

Why is it the commie-lefto geeks always sweep in defending the criminals in the gun debate rather than looking to do something constructive like enforce existing laws? In the case of your argument, it's somehow a gun-owner's fault if someone ILLEGALLY breaks into their home/vehicle and steals their property?

By your logic, if someone steals or borrows your car then proceeds to get drunk and kill a pedestrian we should throw you, the owner of the car, in jail with the person who stole/borrowed it and killed someone. Your "arrest the gun owner" idea reeks of the same level of idiocy.

:: Places hand in "L" shape on forehead, laughs loudly ::

I'm a "commie-lefto geek" by your definition, and I say that the kid got what he deserved.

Why are you so stupid, and overgeneralizing, as to write that?

By the way, I'm not a lefty, I'm more of a separatist. But that won't stop ya, will it.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Gun supporters said the weapon saved Wells' life. Opponents said it took Buford's - that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed.
Dubbya Tee Eff...

The guy was unlucky enough to pull a gun on an armed citizen. That's what happens when you don't pick on helpless people, they fight back. How can anyone blame the death of this kid on the citizen? If the kid had just walked by the house he would still be alive.

He made his choice... Darwin won.
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,454
19,916
146
Originally posted by: manowar821

By the way, I'm not a lefty, I'm more of a separatist. But that won't stop ya, will it.

There's nothing to stop. You agree with him.

But you have to face it, leftists are the only ones who are anti-gun and the only ones saying this shooting was not justified.
 

Connoisseur

Platinum Member
Sep 14, 2002
2,470
1
81
Originally posted by: yuppiejr
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues

if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.

you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.

if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.

we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.

How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?

how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?

or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?

considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.

Why is it the commie-lefto geeks always sweep in defending the criminals in the gun debate rather than looking to do something constructive like enforce existing laws? In the case of your argument, it's somehow a gun-owner's fault if someone ILLEGALLY breaks into their home/vehicle and steals their property?

By your logic, if someone steals or borrows your car then proceeds to get drunk and kill a pedestrian we should throw you, the owner of the car, in jail with the person who stole/borrowed it and killed someone. Your "arrest the gun owner" idea reeks of the same level of idiocy.

My original argument of gun ownership (which Kelvrick provided statistics for, albeit a bit old and providing numbers that aren't overwhelmingly in my favor) was that a lot of these guns are stolen from registered owners. Considering that a lot of the people claim to buy guns to defend themselves, it becomes a vicious cycle. Gun supporters trumpet the cause of protection when so many shootings occur with stolen registered guns. Granted criminals can find guns if they look hard enough, but restricting or at least better tracking legal gun sales reduces the amount of weapons that can potentially be used to commit a crime.

Also, to be fair, my opinion is that the Constitution, while forward thinking in many aspects, was made for a different time; if you recall, it was drafted shortly after a major war where the country was young and still not well protected. Every civilian was given the 'right to bare arms" in case a local militia was needed to go to war against a foreign aggressor at a moment's notice. Something (like the right to bear arms) that doesn't affect the democratic process or our primary freedoms (speech, thought, press, protest, equality etc.) should be scrutinized and revised. I am thoroughly amazed "gun ownership" is a right when something much more necessary (such as an ability to own a vehicle for transportation) is considered a privilege.

Sorry about the rant.

::EDIT:: I also agree that gun owners should take partial responsibility for a weapon that was stolen from them an used to commit a crime. If you own something so dangerous as a gun, you better protect it damn well. It's not like stealing a knife or any other object that can "potentially" be used as a weapon. A gun is a tool specifically made for killing things. It's a huge responsibility for anyone to have; if they fail that responsibility, either purposely or inadvertently, they should be held accountable.
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,673
583
126
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?

I think that's the main point. Most robbers use the gun as a scare tactic to get the victim to just give the goods up complacently. I don't think most of them even expect the dude to pull a gun on them and when they do, they are so dumbfounded that they don't even react till it's too late.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
51,839
7,361
136
Originally posted by: Jeff7

The kid apparently placed a value on human life somewhere below that of the average person's wallet. How much reason is there to place more value than that on the kid's life?

That's an interesting point of view. I hadn't thought about a robbery that way before. I see 3 problems here:

1. The kid tried to rob an innocent person
2. The kid had an illegal weapon
3. The kid pulled a gun during the robbery

I think one of the major problems in America is lack of responsibility. The kid was old enough to know what he was doing, old enough to acquire an illegal firearm, old enough to go looking for trouble - at night, and yet his friends and family are mad at the man the kid tried to victimize and seek punishment. I'm not clear on what their thinking is. I can understand being mad over his death, but if the story is in fact what is printed, then the man's actions were purely self-defense. They tried to rob him at gunpoint - at night - on his front porch. He fought back. It's a tragedy that the robber was killed, moreso that he was a young man in school, but I don't understand why her cousin would question why the police didn't "punish" the victim of the robbery. Exactly what punishment is she seeking? What exactly did he do wrong? Did he have an illegal weapon? Did he try to rob someone in their own home at night? He was probably relaxing on his porch and got jumped. This poor guy is going to catch a lot of flak from this, I feel bad for him.

Sometimes I wonder if the media just sits around and thinks of the most controversial approach to present news material, which in this case was angling it from the robber's supporters point of view. It has certainly created a great deal of debate.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,907
136
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?

Yes there are ways to do it. Just like its possible to disarm someone if you have proper training.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?

I think that's the main point. Most robbers use the gun as a scare tactic to get the victim to just give the goods up complacently. I don't think most of them even expect the dude to pull a gun on them and when they do, they are so dumbfounded that they don't even react till it's too late.

Sucks to be them then.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
"that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed"

how about "that 15yr old might be alive if he didn't pull a gun on someone" or such? place blame where it belongs. the 15 yr old scumbag?