LongCoolMother
Diamond Member
- Sep 4, 2001
- 5,675
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.
you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.
if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.
we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.
How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?
Originally posted by: KK
One less piece of trash to worry about. too bad the guy didn't kill the others.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Gun supporters said the weapon saved Wells' life. Opponents said it took Buford's - that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed.
His cousin, Tameka Foster, 21, questioned why police did not punish Buford's shooter.
"They let that man run out freely," Foster said. "My cousin is dead."
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.
you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.
if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.
we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.
How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?
how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?
or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?
considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.
Originally posted by: leftyman
Originally posted by: BKLounger
let me just make sure i am crystal here. A 15 year old pulls a gun on a person then the other person responds by shooting a weapon (which he had concealed and a permit for) and people are on the side of the 15 year old?
Am i correct in this? who in the world can actually be on the side of the 15 year old with an illegal fire arm who pulled his weapon first?
people of similar morals and make up.
Originally posted by: rivan
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Nobody is ignoring that. Why else would it be ruled a justified shooting?Originally posted by: pontifex
you have to love how everyone completely ignores the fact that the kid pulled a gun on the guy in an attempt to rob him...its all about the guy who shot him and how much a an animal and criminal he is.
his family and the opponents of the ruling...
Something similar has happened here - a kid (18 at the time, I think) kills a cop and his family and others are outraged that he has to face any consequences. There have been "Free Kevin Johnson" t-shirts and "No Tears for McEntee" graffiti.
It's complete crap. I don't understand why people can't accept responsibility for their actions. You pull a gun, expect a violent situation. You kill a cop - complete with witnesses, expect consequences.
Originally posted by: yuppiejr
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.
you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.
if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.
we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.
How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?
how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?
or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?
considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.
Why is it the commie-lefto geeks always sweep in defending the criminals in the gun debate rather than looking to do something constructive like enforce existing laws? In the case of your argument, it's somehow a gun-owner's fault if someone ILLEGALLY breaks into their home/vehicle and steals their property?
By your logic, if someone steals or borrows your car then proceeds to get drunk and kill a pedestrian we should throw you, the owner of the car, in jail with the person who stole/borrowed it and killed someone. Your "arrest the gun owner" idea reeks of the same level of idiocy.
Dubbya Tee Eff...Gun supporters said the weapon saved Wells' life. Opponents said it took Buford's - that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed.
Originally posted by: manowar821
By the way, I'm not a lefty, I'm more of a separatist. But that won't stop ya, will it.
Originally posted by: yuppiejr
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.
you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.
if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.
we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.
How about you focus on giving up your own rights and let others decide what to do with their rights?
how bout if you think you think you deserve the right to have a gun, you have taken on the responsibility to make sure it stays in your posession?
or is that too much of an infringement on your rights?
considering yourr esponse, you seem to think it is, which makes you a big part of the problem, and yhou should never own a gun. time to deal with reality and find pro-gun people that think like you, and eliminate their ability to own them.
Why is it the commie-lefto geeks always sweep in defending the criminals in the gun debate rather than looking to do something constructive like enforce existing laws? In the case of your argument, it's somehow a gun-owner's fault if someone ILLEGALLY breaks into their home/vehicle and steals their property?
By your logic, if someone steals or borrows your car then proceeds to get drunk and kill a pedestrian we should throw you, the owner of the car, in jail with the person who stole/borrowed it and killed someone. Your "arrest the gun owner" idea reeks of the same level of idiocy.
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?
Originally posted by: Jeff7
The kid apparently placed a value on human life somewhere below that of the average person's wallet. How much reason is there to place more value than that on the kid's life?
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Special K
Question for the gun experts here - if you are concealed-carrying your gun and a robber pulls a gun on you, would you even have enough time to draw your own weapon and fire a shot without the robber shooting you first, assuming the robber's gun was loaded and he actually intended to use it?
I think that's the main point. Most robbers use the gun as a scare tactic to get the victim to just give the goods up complacently. I don't think most of them even expect the dude to pull a gun on them and when they do, they are so dumbfounded that they don't even react till it's too late.
