Originally posted by: Kntx
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
i can't believe stupid people put up a memorial at where the kid died. he was a thug, and looked for trouble. he was just asking for it. he deserves no memorial, no balloons, no teddy bears. lame.
Just because the kid was a dick doesn't mean his friends and family arn't going to be affected by his death. I agree the fellow was justified in defending himself, but I wish more people could feel compasion for kid and his family. He may have grown out of his troubles and led a good life. It's sad.
Originally posted by: nonameo
Could it have been handled better? Maybe... but the man was every bit justified in defending himself. I wish the kid didn't have to die, but such is life.
He is also an ex-criminal. Good riddance. :thumbsup: to the guy with the gun.Originally posted by: crt1530
"They let that man run out freely," Foster said. "My cousin is dead."
Originally posted by: Number1
Originally posted by: Kntx
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
i can't believe stupid people put up a memorial at where the kid died. he was a thug, and looked for trouble. he was just asking for it. he deserves no memorial, no balloons, no teddy bears. lame.
Just because the kid was a dick doesn't mean his friends and family arn't going to be affected by his death. I agree the fellow was justified in defending himself, but I wish more people could feel compasion for kid and his family. He may have grown out of his troubles and led a good life. It's sad.
I disagree. This is the way justice should be dispenced. It's called logical concequences and if his parents did not teach him not to holdup people they only have themself to blame.
Juging by the reaction of the neighbourhood, it's no wonder people have to carry guns to protect themself.
Originally posted by: Connoisseur
Seems like another case where you take an extreme (or statistically minor) incident and make it the poster child for a cause. As far as gun control is concerned, I'd like to know statistics on the following:
1) How many shootings are committed by criminals with registered guns or registered guns stolen from civilians or guns purchased through gun shows (not sure if these have to be registered)?
2) How many "justifiable" killings are committed by civilians with registered guns?
I suspect 1>>>2 unless someone can prove me wrong. If they can, i'll gladly tuck my tail between my legs and leave. If i'm right, what justification is there for giving civilians the right to carry concealed weapons. It's pure statistics in my opinion. Now i've never had a gun pointed at me or my family and I feel sorry for those who have experienced this; i'm not sure if it would change my opinion emotionally but i'm willing to bet the majority of gun owners haven't had this happen to them either. I'm not going to discuss the right to bear arms simply because it'll just be a flaming argument between both sides.
::EDIT:: Was responding more to the question of whether or not this event should promote the cause of guns, not whether or not the kid was guilty. I think all the people involved are retarded for blaming a man for defending himself from a couple of criminals.
Gun supporters said the weapon saved Wells' life. Opponents said it took Buford's - that the 15-year-old might be alive if a citizen had not been armed.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: BKLounger
let me just make sure i am crystal here. A 15 year old pulls a gun on a person then the other person responds by shooting a weapon (which he had concealed and a permit for) and people are on the side of the 15 year old?
Am i correct in this? who in the world can actually be on the side of the 15 year old with an illegal fire arm who pulled his weapon first?
Ignorant thug culture douchebags.
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: Connoisseur
Seems like another case where you take an extreme (or statistically minor) incident and make it the poster child for a cause. As far as gun control is concerned, I'd like to know statistics on the following:
1) How many shootings are committed by criminals with registered guns or registered guns stolen from civilians or guns purchased through gun shows (not sure if these have to be registered)?
2) How many "justifiable" killings are committed by civilians with registered guns?
I suspect 1>>>2 unless someone can prove me wrong. If they can, i'll gladly tuck my tail between my legs and leave. If i'm right, what justification is there for giving civilians the right to carry concealed weapons. It's pure statistics in my opinion. Now i've never had a gun pointed at me or my family and I feel sorry for those who have experienced this; i'm not sure if it would change my opinion emotionally but i'm willing to bet the majority of gun owners haven't had this happen to them either. I'm not going to discuss the right to bear arms simply because it'll just be a flaming argument between both sides.
::EDIT:: Was responding more to the question of whether or not this event should promote the cause of guns, not whether or not the kid was guilty. I think all the people involved are retarded for blaming a man for defending himself from a couple of criminals.
Google searched came up with this PDF Article is slightly old, but it answers your questions.
Key numbers from what I see are:
According to the 1991 Survey of State Prison Inmates, among those inmates who possessed a handgun, 9% had acquired it through theft, and 28% had acquired it through an illegal market such as a drug dealer or fence. Of all inmates, 10% had stolen at least one gun, and 11% had sold or traded stolen guns.
Studies of adult and juvenile offenders that the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services conducted in 1992 and 1993 found that 15% of the adult offenders and 19% of the juvenile offenders had stolen guns; 16% of the adults and 24% of the juveniles had kept a stolen gun; and 20% of the adults and 30% of the juveniles had sold or traded a stolen gun.
From a sample of juvenile inmates in four States, Sheley and Wright found that more than 50% had stolen a gun at least once in their lives and 24% had stolen their most recently obtained handgun. They concluded that theft and burglary were the original, not always the proximate, source of many guns acquired by the juveniles.
Your comment was valid, but well, criminals can find other ways to get a firearm where law-abiding citizens can't.
Originally posted by: idiotekniQues
if you own a gun, you should be more careful with it so it doesnt become stolen.
you should be required to get a goddamn real safe taht no punk robber can just crack so that gun cant get on the street. or for that matter, all of your guns.
if you want to be able to own a gun, you should be able to protect it against petty theft.
we not only need some gun control, but gun owners need gun repsonsibility. and that just doesnt mean shooting the bad guys.
