~15,000 blocked intrusions in Zone Alarm in ~7 days of the computer being on 24/7.

Zero Plasma

Banned
Jun 14, 2004
871
0
0
Zero are high rated though, so I guess thats good.I have heard a lot come from you ISP, but I'm getting ~2000 a day. I reinstalled Zone Alarm and then decided to leave that computer on 24/7. Does ~15,000 a week sound right for a computer thats on 24/7? What do you guys get?
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,600
6,084
136
Are you directly connected to the internet or through a SPI/NAT firewall on your router? That sounds freaking high to me - I only get about 7 a day on my Kerio PF on more restrictive custom settings.
 

Rottie

Diamond Member
Feb 10, 2002
4,795
2
81
That is pretty a lot. I have ZoneAlarm Pro Suite 5. I have 180 intrucions that have been blocked and 2 of those have been high rated since last install 3 or 4 months ago. I guess that is because it is running behind NAT built in router.
 

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,916
0
0
I barely get 20 a day according to my router/firewall logs, maybe one of which is highly rated a month.
 

GimpyOne

Senior member
Aug 25, 2004
302
1
0
I've been getting 50-75 per day with 2-5 being highly rated.

Almost all of them are medium, but I'm pretty close to directly plugged in with no firewalls/routers/etc... between my computer and the net.

So, I'd say your number sounds pretty high.

Out of curiosity, have you checked the IP's they are coming from? When I've used Zone Alarm in the past, I know have had problems where it thinks that the DHCP server or someone scanning the network to do a printer install was an intrusion.
edit: or a file share when opening network neigborhood for that manner...
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Depends on connection, my Iptables firewall on cable was getting between 12-1400 packets logged a day. Before changing my SSH from a nonstandard port I would get between 0 and 2000 attempts to log in every day.
 

Firus

Senior member
Nov 16, 2001
525
0
0
The log on my router/firewall show that I get many intrusion attempts at home...it doesn't say what kind or anything though, so I don't know how severe. Seeing as there are so many (probably about 100/day) I don't think they could be all that bad. Reading this post makes me feel a little better, I thought I was getting way too many.
 

wexsmith

Member
Oct 7, 2004
194
0
0
If you use the torrent networks then open up your default traffic ports, 6881-6889 probably, in Zonealarm. Those 2000+ hits will still come through your firewall, but wont be reported by Zonealarm as blocked traffic.

If you don't use the torrent networks then...umm...good luck!
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Looking at the logs is worthless if you don't understand what you are looking at. I'm betting a high rate of false positives.
 

bjc112

Lifer
Dec 23, 2000
11,460
0
76
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Looking at the logs is worthless if you don't understand what you are looking at. I'm betting a high rate of false positives.


I agree.. Zone Alarm is pretty touchy.. Reports damn neear everything..
 

Zero Plasma

Banned
Jun 14, 2004
871
0
0
Okay guys, I've been busy. This computer is not behind a router, it's just pluged directly into a DSL modem.
 

Maluno

Senior member
Mar 28, 2005
697
0
0
Originally posted by: bjc112
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Looking at the logs is worthless if you don't understand what you are looking at. I'm betting a high rate of false positives.


I agree.. Zone Alarm is pretty touchy.. Reports damn neear everything..

Which is why it is an excellent program.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Maluno
Originally posted by: bjc112
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Looking at the logs is worthless if you don't understand what you are looking at. I'm betting a high rate of false positives.


I agree.. Zone Alarm is pretty touchy.. Reports damn neear everything..

Which is why it is an excellent program.

Not really. Reporting nothing is better than reporting everything when the person watching the reports knows nothing. ;)
 

JustAnAverageGuy

Diamond Member
Aug 1, 2003
9,057
0
76
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Not really. Reporting nothing is better than reporting everything when the person watching the reports knows nothing. ;)

Personally, I'd rather know I screwed up my security than think I was safe when the network was totally open.

Paranoid > false sense of security.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Not really. Reporting nothing is better than reporting everything when the person watching the reports knows nothing. ;)

Personally, I'd rather know I screwed up my security than think I was safe when the network was totally open.

Paranoid > false sense of security.

But what good do those alerts do you if you don't understand them? They're just going to freak out some grandma that thinks she is being hacked when someone pings her. :roll:
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
Originally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Not really. Reporting nothing is better than reporting everything when the person watching the reports knows nothing. ;)

Personally, I'd rather know I screwed up my security than think I was safe when the network was totally open.

Paranoid > false sense of security.

Format every few weeks > Buying $100-200 of security software...lol
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
Originally posted by: alm4rr
34168 since install blocked
2946 have been high rated

That would be insanely high for a year, much less that amount of time.