Question 13900K scores lower using Ultimate Performance Power Plan than Balanced in Timespy CPU test

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,039
18,350
146
I'm curious if this is normal.

The difference in 500-700 points lower in CPU score (graphics core unchanged within margin of error). Pretty significant.
 
Last edited:

tamz_msc

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2017
3,865
3,729
136
Yes, it is normal. A lot of parameters - like preferred core, all the new boost technologies Intel has, Thread Director, etc. work best only when you have the power plan (in control panel, not Windows->Settings->System->Power & Battery->Power Mode) set to Balanced. This is true for AMD Systems starting with Zen 3 as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hotrod2go

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,039
18,350
146
Yes, it is normal. A lot of parameters - like preferred core, all the new boost technologies Intel has, Thread Director, etc. work best only when you have the power plan (in control panel, not Windows->Settings->System->Power & Battery->Power Mode) set to Balanced. This is true for AMD Systems starting with Zen 3 as well.

Ah, OK. That makes sense.
 

jarablue

Member
May 3, 2004
120
20
81
Win 11 you want your control panel edit power plan to balanced. Then go to windows settings and go to the power setting and there you set it to best performance. You have to change it in both areas correctly to get the best performance out of win 11. That is what I was told at hardforum.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thibsie and Amused

Wolverine2349

Senior member
Oct 9, 2022
465
154
86
Is this true just on WIN11 or also WIN10?

And I imagine it does not apply if you have a static manual all core overclock and e-cores disabled?