Originally posted by: Gibson486
OK, so just to check....I am guessing that Samsung paid circuit City or something to make sure that their 52 inch TV looked better than all the others by disabling the motion enhancement on other 120 Hz TV's ?
No, according to Cnet, some manufacturers just don't implement 120hz properly.
They had 2 46" Sony Bravia's next to each other at my CC. One had 120hz and one had 60hz, and running the same source, The Bee Movie, and the difference was OBVIOUS especially on scenes were there was a lot of movement and high contrast on alternating lines of color, like the bees shirts. The details were also noticeably fuzzier on the 60hz, without a doubt. And if you want to use it as a monitor, you will want the increased frame rate.
Anyone who says there is basically no difference has not done very much side by side comparisons of it to actually judge the difference. You can't expect to accurately compare it with broad statements like "my dad has a Sony 60hz and I have a Sony 120hz and I see no difference." That is a load of BS. I recommend them compare them side by side, on the same source and they will see LOTS of difference.
I watched Zodiac last night on HD-DVD, and it shows a lot of text, such as newspapers scanning up and down and side to side and the image was crystal clear and completely in focus on my 120hz Samsung. That's what you would expect to see with double the refresh rate. No evident blurriness caused by more interpolated frames at 60hz at all.
Motion Interpolation - Wikipedia
This JVC news bit kind of puts it into perspective by comparing the two refresh rates. Obviously, their news is somewhat proprietary to their developments, but it sums up 60hz LCD panels shortcomings well.
JVC ANNOUNCES 120Hz CLEAR MOTION DRIVE TECHNOLOGY (HIGH-SPEED LCD) FOR FULL HD LCD TVs
LCD Specs Playing with Your Eyes - HDTV Magazine