11 States now have more on Welfare than working

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by dmcowen674, Jan 2, 2013.

  1. DucatiMonster696

    DucatiMonster696 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    4,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    What you're saying is that those with political connections with big government gain benefits that those who are not so well connected are refused or unable to receive. In the end only those who align themselves with the political parties(party) who can pull the big government levers are able to be rewarded with favors and are benefiting. Every other business or individual unwilling or incapable to play the lobbying game is out of luck.
     
    #126 DucatiMonster696, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  2. dmcowen674

    dmcowen674 No Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 1999
    Messages:
    54,836
    Likes Received:
    11
    Wages going down, taxes and costs of everything going up, we are instituting labor camps.
     
  3. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    We don't live in a communist society, yet. Also the public sector CAN provide absolutely vital services, doesn't mean they do all the time.

    I think its obvious that public works, for the most part, are funded by the government first taking the money out of the private sector. If the public sector was anything like the private then places like Cuba would be killing it right now.
     
  4. Dannar26

    Dannar26 Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    4
    Because we are more liberal now than ever. Most people on this board from either side seem to be intelligent folk. How can you not notice that as we become more "progressive" we also become poorer. Seems to be true everywhere but the far north end of Europe where there are fewer people, and a higher portion of their populace are contributers.

    Who are you blaming? Your side's in charge, and has been in charge. Even when Republicans manage to get seats they're still at the mercy of public opinion, which as you've so stridently shown, is against any form of reasonable cutting. Conservatism has been fighting a losing battle for decades. All we can do is slow the losses of freedom, and universal poorness and government reliance.

    People who are responsible citizens are losing ground to all the bottom feeders who make a living out of gaming the system. Hint: pop out lots of kids and then the govt is forced to provide for you and your brood. If your benefits get threatened, bide behind your misbegotten spawnlings. Nobody will have the balls to tell you no then!

    I get that liberals want to save everybody and make sure that everybody has the same chance at the American dream that the children of the rich have. It's great. It's noble. It's also impossible.

    What are you doing to human evolution by making everyone a lazy government drone? Do you think it helps us as a species? Will it help us colonize Mars, or settle the galaxy?

    Really man, I'm not trying to be a jerk (I suspect that the backlash I get will suggest otherwise). But what do you hope to accomplish here?
     
  5. Jhhnn

    Jhhnn Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    34,577
    Likes Received:
    761
    If the private sector was anything like Righties claim it to be, we'd be killing it right now. Bush era deregulation & cheerleading would have created a capitalist utopia.

    Righties fail to comprehend the basic nature of money & where it comes from, why it exists at all. All the money currently in existence has been created by govt, and was literally spent into existence or allowed to exist with fractional reserve banking. Spending, lending & taxes keep it circulating as intended to promote commerce.
     
  6. 1sikbITCH

    1sikbITCH Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,344
    Likes Received:
    68
    Probably pooping their diapers and screaming for mommy.
     
  7. OrByte

    OrByte Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,169
    Likes Received:
    56
    the public sector is funded by the public...not just private sector workers.
     
    #132 OrByte, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  8. OrByte

    OrByte Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2000
    Messages:
    9,169
    Likes Received:
    56
    I don't agree with the logic that the public sector and private sector are competing at business...as you have described.

    Since so much of the work being done by public sector is not the same work being done by the private sector, you cannot draw conclusions that private sector businesses would do a better job than public sector workers and vice versa... I think that is making an argument on too simplistic terms.

    Thats making an argument akin to football players being better athletes than soccer players...therefore football players would be better playing at soccer than soccer players...

    edit on topic:

    I'd like to see a statistical breakdown on the type of individuals on welfare for each of these 11 states...and then cross check that with work eligibility.. I know alot of 6 and 7 year olds probably can't get a job even if their life depended on it.
     
    #133 OrByte, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  9. lotus503

    lotus503 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    6,502
    Likes Received:
    0

    I am saying that and saying its worse. Big banks for example choose who is to control economic and monetary policy for his country, not the government.

    In addition they can pick a politician or a man and take it from conception to election. I'm talking politicians owned lock stock and barrel by industry.

    the government isn't the puppet master here, its the puppet.
     
  10. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    Where do we have this mythical free market you're trying to make fun of?
    Ah, so why doesn't the government just print money to make the lowest paid person in the country a millionaire? That would solve everything.
     
  11. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    I'm sorry you got that from the post. I think there is a place for public sector and the funding for it should come from the private sector as one supports (in theory) the other and vice versa.
     
  12. Jaskalas

    Jaskalas Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    23,327
    Likes Received:
    225
    Heh, the one that needs trillion dollar deficit spending to keep from collapsing after the .gov funded housing bubble popped. They freely admit government spending directly controls it. Of course it was never free, that's just what they call it ensure the backlash feeds into their goal of tax and spend. Keep expanding, keep growing government control. Keep handing out money, or the "free" economy will get you!

    They will have bed time stories with little children scared of the "free economy" under their beds.
     
  13. Meghan54

    Meghan54 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    230

    My God, someone that may actually understand that Southern Democrats are actually Republicans in every way but label.

    What most do not comprehend, either by choice or lack of attention while being taught American history in grade school, is that anyone running for office in the South couldn't get elected to shit if they labeled themselves Republican, once the South was free of the region's takeover by Republican carpetbaggers after the Civil War.

    So, the Democrat label was almost exclusively used to get elected to office, despite them failing to follow any of the typical Democrat "standards" of liberalism. The Southern Democrats are some of the most conservative politicians in the country......very conservative socially, religiously, economically, in any measure of conservatism.

    It's only been in very recent history that any politician calling him/herself a Republican has been able to get elected to public office....and Texas is not part of the South, btw.

    Southern Democrats, until very recently, are Republicans in every shape and form, outside name. In fact, most southern Democrats were probably more conservative than most northern/western Republicans ever tried to be. Ever wonder why the Religious Right has its largest following in the South?
     
  14. Jhhnn

    Jhhnn Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    34,577
    Likes Received:
    761
    So if it's not absolutely "free", then it isn't "free", huh?

    Markets can't exist without govt- they never have.

    When called on your bullshit, you resort to flippant absurdity as a means to avoid cognitive dissonance.

    Read up about it-

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
     
  15. piasabird

    piasabird Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    16,791
    Likes Received:
    15
    When liberal states raise taxes often people move out of the state to find work somewhere else. This leaves only the indigent behind.
     
  16. Jhhnn

    Jhhnn Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    34,577
    Likes Received:
    761
    Pure bullshit. Cite your source.
     
  17. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    Basically yes.
    Who says zero government? I'm not an anarchist.
    Why don't you go suck on Krugmans cock some more you fucking stooge.
     
  18. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    Raise taxes on the "rich" and some of them will do whatever they can to lighten their tax burden. If moving to Texas to do business lightens their tax bill SOME businesses and individuals will do that. Not all but some.

    Try this thought experiment.

    State A raises taxes to 100% and state B has a rate of 0%.

    Would there be any businesses who move from state A to state B?

    The people that are interested in making any money would move to state B.

    All you have to do is make it financially beneficial for something to happen and it will happen more often. How financially beneficial you make determines how many people take advantage of it.
     
  19. Chaotic42

    Chaotic42 Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    31,365
    Likes Received:
    169
    Yay, Mississippi leading the way again!
     
  20. fskimospy

    fskimospy Elite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    47,104
    Likes Received:
    867
    How about we analyze a real experiment instead:
    http://www.stanford.edu/~cy10/public/Millionaire_Migration.pdf

    So yeah, when you raise taxes some people move; a tiny fraction of them. Piasabird's statement was definitely pure bullshit.
     
  21. Jhhnn

    Jhhnn Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    34,577
    Likes Received:
    761
    When called on bullshit hyperbole, you double down. How quaint.

    You're out in the weeds wrt to piasabird's original proposition, anyway-

    I challenged him to support that with something other than hyperbole, something neither of you have accomplished. The only people who might move are those who don't need to "find work". Middle class people don't abandon their jobs & familiar surroundings to avoid taxes. Well, other than teahadist freaks. It's not like high earners are abandoning San Francisco or NYC, either.
     
  22. Jhhnn

    Jhhnn Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    34,577
    Likes Received:
    761
    You started out with hyperbole about Cuba, as if that had some meaning to our own situation. It doesn't.

    I pointed out that if freer markets were the key to prosperity, then the efforts of the Bush Admin certainly should have improved things, but they didn't- they made it worse, precipitated the greatest financial catastrophe of the last 80 years.

    Then you deflected about how we really don't have free markets. When I pointed out the absurdity of that proposition, that so called "free markets" cant exist w/o govt, you get all butthurt, head straight for the bunker o' denial, claim you're not an anarchist.

    The reason that there are more people on welfare than working isn't a failure of govt at all, but rather a failure of the private sector to distribute the rewards of capitalism in a way that's self sustaining. Your much revered Job Creators! aren't doing their part to create jobs at all. If they were, we wouldn't be here, we wouldn't need for the govt to intervene, to actually create jobs with spending.
     
  23. BladeVenom

    BladeVenom Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,541
    Likes Received:
    1
    Government grew during the Bush administration. Government spending almost doubled.
     
  24. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    Just after a cursory skimming of the paper something caught my eye.

    "The New Jersey millionaire tax experiment offers a potent testing ground, given the magnitude of the policy change and the relative ease of relocating to a different state tax regime without leaving the New York or Philadelphia metropolitan areas."
    I may be wrong about this but if your income is made outside of the state it isn't subject to that state's tax rates. The same reason it would be easy for them to leave the state are some of the same reasons that working in another state, ie. NY and PA aren't out of the question. How many of those New Jersey millionaires work in NYC?
    Perhaps a tinge hyperbolic :awe:
     
  25. buckshot24

    buckshot24 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    52
    I don't think Cuba is anything like our situation. The point was that Cuba is mostly public sector. All of their retail stores are state owned (at least they all have the same shit).
    The Bush administration expanded government more than Clinton.
    So you do want a more Cuban style system than we have already?