$100 - (2) 80GB SATA RAID or (1) 250GB SATA Drive

Howland

Junior Member
Jan 18, 2006
24
0
0
Mainly a gaming system.

A RAID would be faster, but consume more power, have 100GB less space and if one drive failed I would be screwed.

Is the extra speed worth it?

Assume $100 is all I have. There is a Western Digital 250GB SATA 16MB drive at ZZF that I am leaning toward.
 

MaxxuM

Member
Jan 15, 2006
27
0
0
You are the only one that could say if it was worth it... but in my case I would always go for faster because I have multiple drives on different controllers so I can place complete backups of my master drives on other ones and be back to work in about 15 minutes. If you actually think that you can fill 200+gigs then go with the bigger drive. I barely get to 80gigs with programs and OS but 300+ with movies, mp3s and so on...
 

stevty2889

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2003
7,036
8
81
Originally posted by: Howland
Mainly a gaming system.

A RAID would be faster, but consume more power, have 100GB less space and if one drive failed I would be screwed.

Is the extra speed worth it?

Assume $100 is all I have. There is a Western Digital 250GB SATA 16MB drive at ZZF that I am leaning toward.

I'd definatly go with the WD 250GB 16mb cache drive. I have one myself, and very happy with it.
 

Bobthelost

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,360
0
0
250 would be faster for everything but sequential read/write. How often do you do gigabyte file editing on your computer?

For gaming it would be slower to get the RAID.
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
No, the extra speed isn't worth it, mainly b/c there's barely any difference in speed (larger platters and double cash narrow the gap significantly) and the added risk of data loss (double the chance with 2 drives) makes it IMO not worth it.
 

jlbenedict

Banned
Jul 10, 2005
3,724
0
0
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: Howland
Mainly a gaming system.

A RAID would be faster, but consume more power, have 100GB less space and if one drive failed I would be screwed.

Is the extra speed worth it?

Assume $100 is all I have. There is a Western Digital 250GB SATA 16MB drive at ZZF that I am leaning toward.

I'd definatly go with the WD 250GB 16mb cache drive. I have one myself, and very happy with it.

Same drive here as well. One of the best drives for the price.