• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

10 Years After Chernobyl - Photo Archive

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Antoneo
The water acts as a moderator and neutron absorber (slowing down the reaction) whilst steam does not.
Is it correct to assume that heavy water is usually used for this purpose?

Both heavy water (D2O) and regular light water (H2O) are used in different types of reactors. The advantage of a heavy water reactor is that unenriched uranium fuel can be used. This is because the heavy water is a much more efficient moderator than light water. A greater number of stray neutrons can be slowed down enough to cause fission in U235. The D2O moderator makes up for the greater abundance of the neutron capturing U238. U238 is much more abundant than U235. U235 actually has to be made by seperating it from the ore using filters.

Btw D2O occurs naturally too, just in very small amounts. It is also seperated from regular water using some special process involving towers where the difference in weight is used to seperate it. The D stands for deuterium and is an isotope of hydrogen.
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: brxndxn
What about the two Japanese cities? Wouldn't they be inhabitible too? Or is a nuclear bomb different?

I've always wondered that too. Anyone have any info on this?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both reinhabited within weeks after being cleaned up. Most of the radioactive debris can be cleaned up, and only a small elevated amount of radiation left in the area for decades, so small it is insignificant. You can read about the radioactive portion of damage from nuclear radiation here in http://www.howstuffworks.com/dirty-bomb3.htm
 
Originally posted by: colonel
humm, how come some trucks dont have the engines? Look they were there after the explosion. The pictures look like the movie "The day after"
The engines, along with countless other items, were sold off to unsuspecting consumers around the world. The city on those pictures isn't the same it was the day everyone evacuated. Everything of value has been carried out of there by thieves.
 
I just got back from reading a lenghthy .pdf file on Chernolbyl. All I can say is :Q How could they be soooooo stoopid!!! Running an unstable reactor with only 6-8 out of the required 30 control rods!?!?! And disabling the emergency cooling unit?? Those Russians and Ukranians need to have their heads knocked some sense into them!!!
 
Back
Top