Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: DWW
It's going to "his" war?
Lets be honest, if you had made the same money with say Al Gore in power you'd still have lost just about the same amount of money.
The only difference is that it would have been spent on some minority cause-of-the-day instead of the war
I see Iraqis as the minority cause-of-the-day.
I see your view as the minority.
Not saying its wrong, but its certainly NOT the prevailing viewpoint of the war.
I'm tired, so I might be misreading your post, but: My comment was not meant as a pro or anti war type comment. Just pointing out how similar the republicans can be to the democrats. The democrats give our money to people willy-nilly, the republicans give our money to other people willy-nilly.
My statement wasnt trying to imply anything. i was simply saying, most think giving money as handouts to people within America is somehow intrinsically a
good thing regardless of what they do with it or whether or not they need it, whereas giving money to people in other countries who have been liberated from a tyrant and may need the money if someone regarded as intrinsically
bad regardless of why they may need it.
Very few people would even mention Iraqi's as being a monirity deserving of American money in any way shape or form. Least, thats how I read your post. It strikes me as someone thats somehow very calm, level headed and composed.... Rather a scary site on ATOT truth be told.....