• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

1 or 2 HD's for Win2K/Linux dual boot?

J

JoeBob

Member
I did a search on the forum and found some tips on how to do the install, but not a lot on whether there is any difference between using two drives or partitioning a large drive. Anyone have any input? I am interested in which is more stable and which provides any performance difference, if at all. Let me know your thoughts as well as any experiences with dual booting. Thanks.
 
I tried in the RH 7.0 days to do a dual on my 27G drive but had lots of partition problems, probably my fault tho. If you're using an older distro or LILO (supposedly GRUB fixes it) then you have to put linux below 8G. I'd just pick up another drive if you have the means. Very easy that way, less chance of hose-ups.

And besides, who can't use more space? 😉
 
...is any difference between using two drives or partitioning a large drive.
I have had both configurations before and if you aren't comfortable with partitioning, then having a second hard drive is easier to work with when installing or removing linux... Plus, an extra hard drive does have its benefits (more space, redundacy) if you have the $.


If you're using an older distro or LILO (supposedly GRUB fixes it) then you have to put linux below 8G.
LILO's 8GB (1024th cylinder) problem was fixed a while back (fixed in 21.3?; now at 22.x), so that shouldn't be a problem anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top