1/6 Just a Preamble?

[Jhhnn]

It's perfectly obvious that Trump tried every trick he could muster to avoid leaving office, including the putsch attempt Jan 6. It was actually pretty pitiful, but it was his last chance, so he took it. The big lie of the stolen election & everything he did thereafter were traitorous. It's a cult of personality given how may gullible people would vote for him again, even after that.

 

[HomerJS]

Can I get a HELL YEAH?!!!!

This is the kind of shit Democrats should have done during impeachment

Cheney Says January 6 Committee Will Bring Contempt Charges Over Subpeonas (businessinsider.com)

 

[MrSquished]

Can I get a HELL YEAH?!!!!

This is the kind of shit Democrats should have done during impeachment

Cheney Says January 6 Committee Will Bring Contempt Charges Over Subpeonas (businessinsider.com)

Well holy shit the Dems got some balls to hold filth accountable. Imagine that. I'm pleasantly surprised

 

[imported_tajmahal]

It's been long proven that it was not a hoax. Maybe you should actually go read the Muller report, or have someone read it and explain it to you, as you have problems reading and comprehending facts. You know, the report that the Courts say Barr Mislead the public on (and who you believed because Fox News shoved that lie down your throat), the very report that does not exonerate Trump by any means, and Muller testified to Congress indicating Trump as not innocent? The very report on the investigation that, all though Trump hide, destroyed, and blocked evidence, still didn't portray Trump as innocent. (there is a reason there are nearly a dozen instances of obstruction in that very report by Trump and his administration). There are other's who have also admitted to it (Trump Jr for instance). There are other federal agencies who have also reported as such. I know, facts you ignore and call fake news because it doesn't fit your lie.

Not sure how you can draw lines from Hillary's comments that can be counted on one hand, to what has been taking place in the Big Lie with Trump since he lost the election. Not even remotely similar.

Every post you throw up shows just how big if a liar you are, and how much you distort reality to the point that it's not even recognizable.

Damn, you can't even fucking spell Mueller right and yet you try to falsely criticize me about not reading it. It's been proven that it was a hoax on the conviction the the FBI agent that falsified the paperwork. It's been bolstered by the work of Durham and his latest indictment of Sussman.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...ongress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611

"Mueller finds no proof of Trump collusion with Russia"

 

[MrSquished]

Damn, you can't even fucking spell Mueller right and yet you try to falsely criticize me about not reading it. It's been proven that it was a hoax on the conviction the the FBI agent that falsified the paperwork. It's been bolstered by the work of Durham and his latest indictment of Sussman.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...ongress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611

"Mueller finds no proof of Trump collusion with Russia"

A better source would be Mueller himself, shitstain.

Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line

‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’

www.politico.eu

Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line

“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”"

 

[imported_tajmahal]

"It was not"......... end of that story.

 

[NWRMidnight]

Damn, you can't even fucking spell Mueller right and yet you try to falsely criticize me about not reading it. It's been proven that it was a hoax on the conviction the the FBI agent that falsified the paperwork. It's been bolstered by the work of Durham and his latest indictment of Sussman.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...ongress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611

"Mueller finds no proof of Trump collusion with Russia"

Oh damn, I made a typo/spelling error, as I was in a hurry and had to go work and didn't proof read. And somehow you extrapolate that as having something to do with false criticism, then go to prove that it wasn't false at all.

You even throw up an article that pushes the same lie Barr pushed and Trump pushed about no collusion. (Did you not comprehend where the courts have already ruled that Barr mislead on what the report said.. aka lied, which is the lie your article is based on).

You have a comprehension problem, as you can't comprehend simple sentence, much less any report. All you have shown is you did not read the muller reports and/or have no compression of what it says. Mueller himself says otherwise, you know the author of the report... All you have given is right wing propaganda talking points, and proving you really are an idiot and a sheep, who is led around by Trump's cock you have stuck in your mouth.

"It was not"......... end of that story.

Yep! You have a comprehension problem, as you can't even comprehend those words are more about members of his campaign, and not so much Trump. You ignored what he actually said about Trump:

"The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office."

Now how can someone be indicted if there isn't evidence to do so???

You also ignored where Mueller said it was not his place to charge a sitting President. Actually of the top of my head, it had something to do with a long standing policy for the DOJ not to go after a sitting President.. IIRCC.

Just think of how much MORE evidence there would be if Trump didn't committ multiple instances of obstruction, which included destroying evidence?

You don't need to answer that, as you have already declared Trump innocent on multiple crimes he did Infront of the world for everyone to see, trying to convince us to believe the same false reality. As if you have this belief that we are as stupid and braindead as you are.

 

[Lost_in_the_HTTP]

Yo, Import, this thread ain't about that.

 

[NWRMidnight]

Yo, Import, this thread ain't about that.

He knows that's but he has to throw everything he can think of, knowing he is a liar and can't justify his bullshit bliz on defending their actions or Trump's.

He somehow believes if he can convince people Trump is innocent and is a saints that it translates to these insurrections as innocent. However in doing so, he is to stupid to realize that he is admitting that Trump was the leader of the insurrection. Otherwise Trump's innocent of all the crimes he committed, upto and including the insurrection, wouldn't have any connection to the insurrectionists.

 

[HomerJS]

He knows that's but he has to throw everything he can think of, knowing he is a liar and can't justify his bullshit bliz. On defending their actions or Trump's.

He's the master of the Chewbacca defense