i'm currently trying to decide between two mobo's, the asus a7v133 and the msi k7t266 pro. yes i realize they have different chipsets so it's kind of like comparing apples to oranges, but the reason i'm posting the message in this forum follows...
the a7v133 with a 1.3ghz athlon runs about $224
the k7t266 pro with a 1.3 ghz athlon runs about $250
woopy
BUT
the k7t266 pro with a 1.2 ghz athlon runs about $210, so it's actually cheaper than the a7v133 with a 1.3ghz chip and i get the benefits of ddr memory.
so i'm asking... for someone who primarily uses a computer for multimedia things (games, and the such) is there such a huge difference between a 1.2 and a 1.3 processor?
thanks for the help, if you can't tell already i'm very new to the hardware scene.
the a7v133 with a 1.3ghz athlon runs about $224
the k7t266 pro with a 1.3 ghz athlon runs about $250
woopy
BUT
the k7t266 pro with a 1.2 ghz athlon runs about $210, so it's actually cheaper than the a7v133 with a 1.3ghz chip and i get the benefits of ddr memory.
so i'm asking... for someone who primarily uses a computer for multimedia things (games, and the such) is there such a huge difference between a 1.2 and a 1.3 processor?
thanks for the help, if you can't tell already i'm very new to the hardware scene.
