0-60 and 1/4 time of new mustang gt ,mach1, and cobra?

[wellerdball]

just curious.

 

[minus1972]

I trust NFS4 will be here to enlighten you in a matter of seconds.....

 

[wellerdball]

I sure hope so.

 

[Pacfanweb]

The times really depend on your driving skill. Depending on what mags you read, the times can vary quite a bit.
The cars are, from fastest to slowest:
Cobra: around 12.9 @111mph
Mach: est. in the 13's
GT: 14.7

Edit: 0-60
Cobra: 4.7
Mach: 5.3
GT: 5.9

 

[wellerdball]

what the hell!?!the gt is barely 14.7 thats lame for whats over a 200ci engine putting out over 300lbs/trq

 

[Pacfanweb]

That's just the first test I came across. YMMV. Depends on the driver. I'd say that's not too inaccurate.....I've seen plenty of GT's at the 1/8 mile drags and they typically run anywhere from 9.3-9.6's....which would put them in the mid to high 14's to right at 15 flat.

 

[svtour]

from what i heard, the new gt's run low 14's with driver skill. low 12's i believe for the cobra

 

[notfred]

From my experience and observtions at the track:

GT: 14.0
Cobra: 12.6
Mach 1: not out yet, but I've seen numbers from magazines where ford put drag slicks on the back of an otherwise stock Mach 1 and ran in the high 12s, so I'd guess mid-low 13s on the stock tires.z

And yes, a new, stock GT will run 14.0

 

[wellerdball]

hmmmm how does that cobra compare to a regular vette in times?and a zo6?

 

[LAUST]

Originally posted by: wellerdball
hmmmm how does that cobra compare to a regular vette in times?and a zo6?

I think it's ET is just shy of the Z06 and the Vette has a few more MPH in the 1/4

Basically that S/C on the cobra will give it an amazing torque band

Edit: Plus knowing Ford they will leave plenty of room for a bigger crank pulley

 

[wellerdball]

the zo6 would out handle it and outlast it right?

 

[Angrymarshmello]

what the hell!?!the gt is barely 14.7 thats lame for whats over a 200ci engine putting out over 300lbs/trq

Like PFW said, it depends on the driver. MM&FF's project 2001/02 GT ran a 13.7 BONE STOCK. I'm sure others have too, others hit in the 14's, and the people who don't know how to drive hit 15's. You can say 14.7 is lame but it's all in the driver - have you ever seen a Corvette run 14's? I have. Now that's lame.

notfred - C&D tested the Mach1 vs the 350z, S2000, and Audi TT. Guess who came in 1st? No surprise there - 350z. Guess who came in 2nd? Mach1 baby....and costs less than any of it's competition. They said it ran a 5.3 0-60, didn't see a 1/4 time listed. (I'll look that up)

 

[wellerdball]

whats the 350z times?

 

[Angrymarshmello]

Here's the article comparing the 4:

http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/comparisontests/2002/december/0212_comparo_hottin.xml

 

[CraigRT]

Originally posted by: wellerdball
whats the 350z times?

Better.

but seriously.. can't you look this up yourself?
i mean, all everyone else does is search for it too...
if you asked me... i'd go to Google.com and type in "350z 0-60"

just a suggestion.

 

[wellerdball]

Originally posted by: Yield

Originally posted by: wellerdball
whats the 350z times?

Better.

but seriously.. can't you look this up yourself?
i mean, all everyone else does is search for it too...
if you asked me... i'd go to Google.com and type in "350z 0-60"

just a suggestion.

sssshhh silence little baby i got my info already no no no shhhh quietly now