Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
Originally posted by: arrfep
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
Might work if you move it to Boston first.
You guys inadvertantly got close to what inspired this. In the thread about the physicists breaking the speed of light, someone posted that photons have mass.Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
IIANM, photons have relativistic mass, but have no rest mass.Originally posted by: Rastus
You guys inadvertantly got close to what inspired this. In the thread about the physicists breaking the speed of light, someone posted that photons have mass.Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
If a photon has 0.000...1 mass, and 0.000...1 = 0, then you could theoretically accellerate that amount of mass to the speed of light. If 0.000...1 != 0, then you can't.
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: arrfep
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
Might work if you move it to Boston first.
Are you suggesting that bulk beef migrates?
Originally posted by: Sentrosi2121
If something has the smallest amount of a 'thing' in it, it no longer weighs 0 (insert preferred weight measurement here)
Originally posted by: Rastus
You guys inadvertantly got close to what inspired this. In the thread about the physicists breaking the speed of light, someone posted that photons have mass.Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
:| Look, just put that number on a conveyor belt, strap ~10lbs of bulk beef to it and kick it into a SPIDERs web, will you? TPAD.
Look if you strap 10lbs of bulk beef on to the number it will never take off. :|
That is messing with the parameters of the test!
If a photon has 0.000...1 mass, and 0.000...1 = 0, then you could theoretically accellerate that amount of mass to the speed of light. If 0.000...1 != 0, then you can't.
Originally posted by: mugs
There is no such thing as 0.000....1. You can't have something that comes after something that repeats infinitely.
Originally posted by: Rastus
Is it true? Are there any proofs or disproofs of it?
Originally posted by: dugweb
is this thread a parody?
Originally posted by: Doctor Nyse
The real problem is that there is no attainable Zero.
omgOriginally posted by: keeleysam
It's not zero, but it is effectively zero.
Originally posted by: mugs
There is no such thing as 0.000....1. You can't have something that comes after something that repeats infinitely.