One goal is to end free weather forecasts….
Because some rich fucks who donate to the GOP own services like accuweather and want to force everyone to use their services to increase profits.
Just standard end stage capitalism rent seeking bullshit.
Yes. If the Weather Service is dismantled they wouldn’t have a choice.Would that include the military? Would they have to buy their weather forecasts for D-day-like landings or airborne operations, from private companies (that could presumably even be foreign-owned)?
Putin can’t believe how gullible we are. Victory so close he can taste itThis video (released 8 hours ago) is excellent on the threat of Project 25:
OMG: Trump plan to ELIMINATE future elections is exposed
What I also take from that is that Trump would turn all TV and radio news into something resembling Fox News. 🤮This video (released 8 hours ago) is excellent on the threat of Project 25:
OMG: Trump plan to ELIMINATE future elections is exposed
He says only he can fix the country. He wants to run it, likely more powerful than Putin or Xi, actually. If he eliminates the Civil Service and is in control of the strings to appoint hundreds of thousands of federal employees (to replace the Civil Service) and have the ability to have any of them fired for any reason, legal or not (Immunity!) he will be the undisputed Dictator of America. And indeed, as explained in the video, it may become very difficult to be elected unless you're a Republican. The way back to democracy in the USA may be little more than a fairy tale.What I also take from that is that Trump would turn all TV and radio news into something resembling Fox News. 🤮
Mr. Vance, the Ohio senator and now Mr. Trump’s running mate, predicted on the podcast that the former president, who had been recently disgraced by his insurrectionary attempt to overturn the 2020 election, would nevertheless run again in 2024. Should Mr. Trump win, Mr. Vance said, he had some advice: “Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.” And if the courts ruled against him? No problem, Mr. Vance said: Just blow them off.
“We are in a late republican period,” he added, alluding to weakness in the ancient Roman Republic. “If we’re going to push back against it, we have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with.”
His interviewer, Jack Murphy, prominent in the right-wing pro-masculinity world, agreed and said, “Among some of my circle, the phrase ‘extra-constitutional’ has come up quite a bit.” Mr. Murphy said it was necessary “to become a little more robust in our behavior” in order to “refound the country,” and Mr. Vance responded, “That’s exactly right.”
Extra-consitutional being the end of American democracy. Not that they careThe US legal system seems to already be politicized to a scary degree. The blatantly partisan nature of the Supreme Court is just the visible tip of the iceberg.
![]()
Opinion | Judge Cannon and JD Vance Are on the Same Team
Precedent and the rule of law? Not if it gets in the way.www.nytimes.com
Sometimes I think that people who think like you should get those policies and live under them and see how it is when the rights that you enjoy at the moment are stripped away from you personally. They won't just target the people you don't like they will be your rights that are taken away.The Heritage Foundation is here to help restore confidence by reducing leftist interference in everyday administration. This is a laudable goal and should be undertaken this year if possible.
Can confirm Harris was on the ticket when I voted in the primary, dumbfuck.Does this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
Does this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
1/10, you should stop taking the bath saltsDoes this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
Does this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
Does this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
Harris is mentioning Project 2025 when a reporter asks what she's having for lunch. A candidate with ironclad message discipline is refreshing.
Definitely keep hammering this 2025 horseshit, and keep hammering abortion. Trump and Vance will hopefully have to keep answering questions and addressing both over and over again. Either they own them--as they actually do--publicly (which likely hurts them with independents) or they they try to distance themselves from them (which likely gets the Maga types upset). Getting more independents out to vote, or creating more discouraged Magas that might not vote, sounds like a win-win.
Biden and Harris were chosen by the voters as a ticket.Does this plan include installing a candidate for President not chosen by a party's voters? So much for fighting for democracy.
Look a candidate choosing not to accept a nomination is a coup. What's not a coup is when you try to get your VP to throw out an election you lost.The process of moving from Biden to Harris as the candidate now is the exact same outcome that would LEGALLY take place if something were to happen to Biden between the election and inauguration day.