Search results

  1. O

    Bulldozer ES benchmark is out!

    i think you have confused westmere with wolfdale ;) btw also considering the ES, the beta bios, some lack of optimizations etc. etc. etc.... the IPC seems to be lower than a phenom... :whiste: at least for the single core, for the whole CPU don't know
  2. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    sorry jfamd but i don't understand one thing: the turbo is fixed to the max frequency or is variable at intermediate multiplier settings? for example: defaulf frequency: 3ghz all core boost: 3.5ghz the all core boost can auto-adjust also at 3.1-3.2-.3.3-3.4ghz for match the tdp or is fixed...
  3. O

    Bulldozers Weak/Strong points?

    weak point: isn't yet released strong point: cause isn't yet released, we can suppose superlative performance :biggrin:
  4. O

    Is Ivy Bridge the answer to AMD Bulldozer ?

    you forget the chipset bug that have stopped the sales
  5. O

    Better late then never Intel.. Westmere 10 Core Lineup

    i'm referring to both 10 and 8 cores westmere-ex i'm curious to see a picture of that dies... are big like a gpu die
  6. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    who decide if a 4-threads task can run faster with 2 full-active modules or 4 half-active modules?
  7. O

    Better late then never Intel.. Westmere 10 Core Lineup

    impressive :eek: but they will be monolitic dies or two smaller dies with a bus beetween?
  8. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    4 core SB without GPU are around 180 mm2
  9. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    maybe a typo... i'm agree, 1155 is a mainstream platform that will compete with Llano, bulldozer should compete with the enthusiast socket of intel, maybe 2011 or 1356... btw all depend on the price/performance ratio and availability
  10. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    yeah that's a AMD slide, i think they show pro-AMD benchmarks... that's marketing ;) just my estimate, 300-330 mm2... well... why compare a 95W CPU with two 125-130W cpus? btw... if that performances come from a 95W bulldozer you shoud change the name in "GODZiller" ^_^
  11. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    i7-950 130W TDP 1100T 125W TDP the comparison is with that 2 processors i know SB is at 95W and the HD2000 waste ~15W at full load... SB 4x is also much smaller than the ~310 mm2 Bulldozer
  12. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    2. 8 "half" cores vs. 8 threads. remember what JF said: if two cores give 100% one module give 80% of throughput 4. speed doesn't matter... i think the comparison is at same TDP
  13. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    don't know... you should ask to an amd fanboy :D
  14. O

    Rumour: Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II.

    on the same website today they show the slide under NDA where is described the Bulldozer estimated performance http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci/haberleri/iste-AMDnin-Bulldozer-islemcileri-icin-ilk-resmi-performans-dokumani.htm i have counted the number of pixels in every rectangle, here the...
  15. O

    Bulldozer delayed again until "summer" *edit* AMD says it's not delayed

    nope... summer start at 20-21th of june and Q2 is until 30 june we have a 9 days window
  16. O

    Bulldozer delayed again until "summer" *edit* AMD says it's not delayed

    can you confirm that Thomas Seifert said "early summer" for Bulldozer? can he be wrong?