If you can spend to get 2560x1600, you won't regret it. Much more screen real estate than 1920x*, especially if you're setting fonts to larger than default to improve readability.
My corrected vision is fine at the moment with 27" 2560x1440, so I imagine 2560x1600 on a 29" diagonal would be fine.
Why do you say that? https://www.anandtech.com/show/8790/anandtech-acquired-by-purch
They bought Anandtech for the main site, surely not for these forums.
I'm mostly a lurker, and it's clear to me that over the years, these forums have become a bit less active.
Although these forums have always had a tongue-in-cheek separation from the main site, I think it's time that the comment section for each article on the main page be a thread on these...
I thought we were talking about computer monitors, not TVs. I have no experience with non-native resolutions on televisions, and it may be that TVs are slower at non-native resolutions.
I was also under the impression that non-native resolutions that evenly divide the non-native resolution are...
Ultimately, it would require a measurement to determine whether or not non-native resolutions are slower than native resolutions, and of course it would monitor-dependent. In my experience, I have not felt increased lag on the monitors I own.
For what it's worth, professional CS players use a...
This discussion is academic. I've never noticed increased latency from running a non-native resolution on a monitor. So any increase is probably insignificant relative to the inherent input lag of the device.
If you're talking about console games like Uncharted 4 (singleplayer is 1080p 30 FPS...
But is 75 C or even 85 C that bad for your GPU? I'm more inclined to stick with manufacturer's settings, and if temperatures and or fan speeds are too high for your own perception, then I would try undervolting and or underclocking.
So what are you trying to say? That their benchmarks are marred by their choice of titles, some of them FPS-locked and others GPU-limited?
Then given the flaws, how can you say that the benchmark proves "anything above 4 cores is a waste of money"? This is precisely why a CPU-bound game like...
It's a shame that these benchmarks rarely include widely played esport games like lol, dota, or csgo. CSGO is CPU-bound, and players want the highest FPS possible.
Although I don't own an ipad, I can type pretty quickly using the on-screen keyboard. The only trouble is that it takes up screen real estate. The idea of a keyboard that also acts as a cover for the ipad is pretty appealing, but unfortunately the keyboard and the pencil cost so much.
All 144 Hz 27" IPS panels are 8 bit panels, with some white uniformity and backlight problems, a bit dependent on chance. 144 Hz is a great upgrade for games, and I'm sure you can calibrate the panel, but it won't be specialized for color accuracy.
There are some 27" 4K 144 Hz displays coming...
Huh. From what I've read about Go, it is a game where it's not possible for computers to calculate the likely outcomes for all possible moves, hence the achievement of a computer capable of playing the game.
That kitchen is funky. It actually looks relatively recent compared to everything else in the home.
That urinal is pretty ugly, but it saves water. Good for socal.
That seems to require the video player to know the monitor refresh rate. Is that always the case? http://testufo.com works on Safari and Chrome, but not Edge for example. Are html5 video players in web browsers refresh rate aware?
Hmm given that many computer displays minimize input lag, I doubt computer displays do this. Some sort of plugin as TheELF mentioned could do this however.
Looks like the best solution to handling 24, 30, and 60 FPS is a minimum 120 Hz refresh rate.
So if I have a 60 Hz monitor showing a 60 FPS video, I should be able to see every frame because the time between each frame is the same as the time between each monitor refresh.
But what if I'm now trying to watch a 24 FPS video? Or what if I have a 75 Hz monitor showing a 60 FPS video?
I...
But what about the contrast shift for viewing straight on versus off angle? Makes VA worse than TN IMO. You get high contrast ratio, but the contrast shift which makes everything black is bothersome.
Which one is the TN? The one on the right? Can't tell.
Are TN panels really that bad? I use both TN and IPS, and minus the color shifting, I think TN is decent. The shifting isn't that strong on modern panels either, and I prefer TN shifting to VA contrast shift.
The Dell one is an 8-bit panel...
It's really simple. You wrap it around yourself and roll the outside into the inside. If you want it to stay, you need to roll the entire top, maybe even twice around.
I think you're implying a tradeoff that may or may not be necessary.
It feels like the architecture has not change substantially since Sandy Bridge. Or maybe it's psychological: we've been on the same 4-number naming scheme since Sandy Bridge.
Yes. You pull off the head to replace it, and in the mechanism that attaches the head, there's all this moisture and gunk.
I recall one of the models I had with instructions saying to turn it on and to brush like normal, which I imagine would be more effective than just holding it against the...
electric toothbrushes get kind of gross and gunky because they have more crevices/separate parts and you don't throw them away after a few months.
And I think with many of them, you still have to do a normal brushing motion while it's rotating, so it doesn't seem to save on effort either.
Well my understanding is that in the past, benchmarks with more threads than cores yielded little performance gain. e.g. a four-thread process on a 2 core HT CPU does not perform much better than a two-thread process (< ~5%) even though the four-thread process would scale well on a quad core...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.