IDK, awesome thanks.
So basically you are saying that IBM themselves had second class process technology, and therefore, whoever licenses it will also only get second class process technology. And this is why IBM - Chartered licensing model did not work as they could not compete against best...
In light of what's happening with Samsung and GF, I thought we could take a step back to see why similar licensing model between IBM and Chartered really did not work out. Does anyone have details on why Chartered kept licensing from IBM since 2002, yet, they kept losing money, eventually...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.