Recent content by Wolverine2349

Is Xeon E for entry level servers? In such case seems unlikely there will be an unlocked version as Xeon E CPUs are locked. Hope to be I feel something seems off with responsiveness and latency with AMD 9800X3D. I went back to 14700K as such. Feels smoother and snappier in games even at 4K...

Is Xeon E for entry level servers? In such case seems unlikely there will be an unlocked version as Xeon E CPUs are locked. Hope to be wrong though.

Yeah agree. Though cannot find any information on it. And is this really a new die the Core 5 120F. Its 6 P cores no e-cores and Intel has had this with Alder Lake the Core i5 12400 and 12500 which is a 6 + 0 Alder Lake die Many of the lower end 13 and 14th Gen parts are rebranded Alder Lake...

For those saying why get this now? Is it even coming? Has anything more than rumors been confirmed that a 12 Raptor Cove P cores on a ring bus Bartlett Lake CPU unlocked is indeed coming for sure??? If I google it cannot find any news on this any later than June 3. If it really had legs that...

I agree with that. Though there are a decent number of 6 core CPUs. Now CPUs with less than 6 cores there are not that many and ones that are only dual are few and far between and bottom of barrel. When is last time there was a single core CPU released. I was able to buy a dual core 12th Gen...

Yeah Golden Cove not quite 25% faster clock for clock than Zen 3. How much faster is it then Zen 3 clock normalized? Am I close on these estimates. Like 15% to 17% I think. And Rapor Cove is 5% faster clock normalized than Golden Cove? And is Golden Cove like 2% to 3% faster than Zen 4...

Based on that chart it still looks almost on par wit Zen 3 overall, Though some workloads Skymont wins and some Zen 3 wins? Am I missing anything? They are clocked only 100MHz difference? Oh wait Skymont 4600 5800X3D Zen 3 4500 and 5950X Zen 3 4900

Based on that graph is Spec CPU 2017 clock normalized. I imagine it is. So in that case Skymont IPC is roughly on par with Zen 3 or barely within margin of error 1% to 2.5% behind.

Raptor Lake is actually a darn good product latency and input better than 9800X3D for gaming. If only degradation was under control which it may now be with the microcode updates and better binning and newer production batches.

So basically Skymont IPC is actually that good, but its implementation on Arrow Lake was so bad as the rest of Arrow Lake memory subsystem and tile to tile latency that its all for naught just like its gaming performance collapsed big time vs Raptor Lake.

I remember Intel claimed it would be 2% better than Raptor Cove. While Skymont impressed and was a big leap over e-cores in Raptor Lake let alone Alder Lake, it seems it was not clocked normalized Raptor Cover IPC. So what is Skymont IPC actually like clock normalized? Is it like Zen 3, a bit...

I totally agree with that. Why would they go through trouble of making it if large NEX and OEMs did not ask for it. Gamers not a big part of the market even though we would like them to cater to us more. Which sadly means probably a locked only variant with lower clock speeds on OEM only for...

I read that somewhat old news as over 1 1/2 months old. Though maybe relevant with recent last day or 2 news???

Yeah in that case its probably not a gamers dream if its only for those markets and locked. Some mobos have eCLKs where you can bypass and overclock anyways, though not sure if it allows it for RAM overclocking like getting DDR5 speeds better than 5200. You really want at least high 6000s or...

If it just for NEX and OEM would hat mean it is for sure locked for RAM and ring and CPU core overclocking?