Recent content by Vossy96

I presume you haven't actually read any of my posts? I've stated countless times that Intel are much better and I will 100% be switching to intel in the coming months. I already have the 6300, I just wanted to see if the reviews for Intel really were much stronger than the recommendations for...

This is almost identical to what I stated on the other post. I stated that AMD are only considered bad because Intel are better and most of the people who replied about AMD just said AMD is straight up bad

That's pretty much my point. Sure, Intel wins by miles performance wise, but I struggle to understand how a CPU that can run fallout 4 on high at 1440p can be considered a bad chip.

I have stated on many numerous occasions that Intel are better than AMD. I know that's a fact, I'm even 100% going to switch to Intel at some point in the next 2 months; what my argument is pointing out is that AMD aren't as bad as everybody makes out. Sure, they lose on benchmarks by quite a...

Firstly, your post makes almost no sense, because using a double negative would mean you're siding with me, which seems extremely unlikely. Secondly, your profile quote tells me that you can't stand the idea of AMD and will do anything in your power to slay them at every given opportunity...

I'm talking about hojnikb and phynaz, but everybody else's serious opinions are greatly appreciated Sorry, I probably shouldn't have said the majority and should've made it clearer - I was referring to those guys who were mentioning my post about AMD calling me a troll and saying I work for AMD.

The majority of people on this website seem to be a bunch of Intel fanboys who can't take anything positive or neutral about AMD. If any of you actually read my last post you'll see that I called Intel much better for performance and in fact it's that last post that's made me question whether an...

I'm not biased towards AMD, in fact I'd much rather have an Intel chip as they're world's apart with performance, but everybody is saying what I'm reporting in performance is impossible, so the fact I can play Fallout 4 on high in 1440p in a stable manner while recording in the background really...

My graphics card (R9 380) is hovering around 50 degrees on idle(right now it's at 57), which is hot. In my previous build it was about 34 on idle. Now granted, the fans on my GPU don't spin on light loads, as they're the Zero Frozr fans, but that should still reflect previous temperatures...

Would like genuine unbiased opinions here. I read a lot on here about how the i3 is better than the 6300, but never know if that's fact or opinion. Based on real world gaming performance, paired with an R9 380 4GB, what would perform better?

Just got an MSI 970 motherboard and an FX 6300, but I'm on the same version of windows that I had with my Phenom II x4 965 and M5A78L. Good idea to do a clean install or can I keep the same Windows installation? Thanks!

I do. Are there any particular mods you want me to install or would you prefer me to test a clean copy? Edit: Oh I missed your first post. I'll get that downloaded now. You want me to record or just report the results?

Here you guys go: Now you can see clearly that it's quite stuttery and jumpy at times, but blame that on recording. Recording at full quality at 1440p was an absolute killer, so much so that I was monitoring usage on my second monitor and before I'd even got into the game, recording just the...

Ooops, so I did. Here: Btw I just uploaded the video to YouTube. Just waiting for the 1440p option to become available because as of yet 360p seems to be the only quality I can choose. And yeah, I'm not running it on full ultra because even if my CPU could handle it my graphics card couldn't...

I will have to post the video on Fallout 4 and not GTA 5 unless you can wait a few hours for it to download and install? Surely Fallout 4 is more CPU and GPU intensive anyway isn't it?