Recent content by thanh25896

Product can refresh and noctua nt-h1 refreshed too . This confirm maybe on old product and no proof on this confirm . I want to know the truth because all liquid meta made from 2/3 of gallium so it can't reach 73 w/mk or 80 w/mk . It is impossible to get 73 or 80 w/mk so we need test for the truth

1st: Pro is only 32.6 w/mK? Proof? 2nd: This is not the delid testing 3rd: I didn't see the result of Liquid Pro . This theard is only tested with CLU . 4rd : I didn't see any Clear transparency on this test with no compare some test result , time test after application and do you know liquid...

Proof please !

So that is my question for testing new CLP and Conductonaut !

In this test Conductonaut is lower temp than CLU 4.5*C so I want to know about CLP vs Conductonaut https://www.hwcooling.net/en/coollaboratory-liquid-ultra-vs-thermal-grizzly-conductonaut/

Hi everyone , I have a some question about performance of Coollaboratory Liquid Pro vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut when placed between die and IHS . I saw the conductivity of Liquid Pro is 80 w/mk and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut is 73 w/mk but it is just a number of manufacturer said not real...