Then I'm sure you might have also seen or heard of this "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth". We haven't eliminated all impossibilities, yet.
Oh, you mean like the discussion in text form on this forum?
As to why? Because the videos theorized a few points where if you bothered to watch at least one of them, makes sense, which then lend itself to the text discussion that you are participating in. See how that works?
Because in videos, you can present both your talking points, and the multimedia references you may be making, which would be impossible in text form. It could also be because it's easier to share on a very popular platform? I mean, an idiot like me could come to that conclusion.
"In science, Occam's razor is used as a heuristic guide in the development of theoretical models, rather than as a rigorous arbiter between candidate models.[1][2] In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; the preference...
William of Ockham (1287–1347), if you actually take a step back from that mirror and see things other than yourself, you may learn a thing or two. I'm not holding my breath for that.
"In science, Occam's razor is used as a heuristic guide in the development of theoretical models, rather than...
Sure, let's put a label on it and demonize it.
Because, you know, antifa are actually anti fascist. Anyone who's for free speech is a racist white supremacist, and so on...
But, more importantly, do you have any answers for my questions?
Look, we ALL know they're not done, that's why some of us are questioning the current situations based on incomplete information. The final answers may be the answers to some of the questions that are being asked. It may also be exactly what they told us all along. YOU and others are taking...
You're putting way too much trust into the same people that couldn't get a timeline straight with trivial queries. Even when he checked in was in question a few times. Or when the security guard got shot. That's my evidence for 1. Believing that they're incompetent. 2. Believing that they can...
We don't, but I'm just going off what I see. The room where he died, the room where they photographed, has a lot of weapons in it, along with magazines, etc... so I would assume I would see a lot more bullet casings than what's shown. Maybe he just shot a lot from the other window, ran back...
Have you ever fired a gun? It's quite simple physics, even for someone with low IQ/low Edu like myself to understand. When you fire a gun, the bullet travels at a speed faster than sound (I'm gonna have to qualify this with "Depends on which bullets", because some idiot will say "THAT'S NOT...
Surely you saw the pictures of the whole room, right? That right here is a bit dishonest in your part. Again, based on the hit rates and firing rates, there should be A LOT more shell casings in that room. At least where his body was. You know, his body where he's got a rifle on bi-pod over...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.