I see so overclocking doesn't really do that much. And I love win2k. NO comparison with win9x. No blue screens, no lock ups. I think I should just get a faster cpu :-)
Check this out:
Link for benchmarks
However the texture detail isn't known and neither is the lighting detail etc... that changes the fps a lot too
However I think the mode "Normal" is 640x480 @ 16bit
I get like 50 fps in 640x480 16bit and that benchmarks shows like 70
I just compared my scores to some of other benchmarks done on other sites and hell my fps are way lower then theirs. Maybe its because of win2k or the detonator 3 drivers.
It is a regular TNT2 16mb with default 125/143
I overclocked it to 160/175
And I have a heatsink and fan so it's stable.
My quake3 setup is default
I just changed from fastest to high quality and I never changed anything else. And the resolution wasn't changed either. I just switch the...
System Specs:
Abit Bh6
Celeron 300a@450
196 pc100 sdram
15 gig 5400rpm Quantum HD
TNT2 16mb 160 core /175 memory w/Detonator 3 drivers.
Windows 2000 Professional
FASTEST - 58.2 FPS
FAST - 52.1
NORMAL - 50.8
High Quality - 42.9
Do these look right or too low?
Yeah it support 2.1-3.5v
However how would i set the jumpers for 400mhz amd k6-2.
I only have instructions for the pentium cpus 75-233 and the
K5 - Pr 75-166
K6 - Pr 166-233
The 400mhz k6-2 would compare to which of these options.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.