yup torque is force at a distance from a point of axis...
and yes the the belt transfers torque to the wheels i didn't say otherwise...,
however you were surgesting a feedback loop whereby the belt increasing in speed directly causes the wheels to increase in rotation which casuses...
the belt would only continualy pick up speed if the plane continualy increased thrust.
the belt moving does not directly cause the wheels to increase in rotation, consider if the plane is stationary with no thrust.. the belt moving causes the plane to move not the wheels to rotate.
as it...
i think they mean the rotation of the wheels when they say "the wheels move forward" however its impossible to say for certain so you could be correct,
in which case in your interpretation you assume that when they the say "the wheels move forward" they mean the entire plane moves...
well yes it doesn't say the conveyor matches angular velocity but neither does it say linear velocity of the wheels, however i think that it means angular
in full
"The plane increases it's thrust and the wheels begin to rotate. The belt compensates for the rotation of the wheels in...
He calculates the force the conveyor exerts at 36000 lbs! thats quite a bit!! I think this calculation is ~correct even though he states 4.5 meters per hour instead of meters per second.
then he messes up he says force = mass * speed.... which it doesn't... force= mass...
THE PLAIN DOES NOT TAKE OFF IN THE SCENARIO DESCRIBED!!!!!!
ok slightly different way of looking at it...
If the plane was stationairy, engines off - no thrust, and the conveyor belt starts to move backwards, the plane would move with it i'd say, all agree? hence the plane starts going...
thanks for the info!!
i tried it with just 2 sticks and it's much happier, i can get 250mhz @ 2.5-3-3-7 3.2v and its ok if a bit flaky, however super pi times at this are not much of an improvement due to the looser timings stil 29s for 1m
however.. i can get another 300mhz out of the cpu...
yeah it is 4 x 256, guess thats not ideal though they are all identical,
i dont think the intel boards have an option for command rate, not a bad idea to try them idividualy, though it'll be annoying if that is the cause,
thanks.
thanks for the offer, however i currently have all 4 slots filled so i assume i can't use the booster.... i was really hoping for an easy solution but i guess there isn't one!
hmm, adding fans didn't really seem to help
i can run at 2-2-2-7 200 and get no erros in memtest, but at say 220 and 2.5-3-3-7 @ 3.2v I get tons of errors on test #5.. and your right about cas 3 being no good.
i guess my ram is just a bit duff?
darn.... 3.2v is the most my board will do, still i was thinking that should get me above 200.. relaxing the cas timmings doesn't seem to help either? i run 2-2-2-7 at 200 but if i say drop to 3-3-3-7 this doesn't help me get above 200...
i'll try sticking some fans on the ram
Hey,
I'm trying to overclock some slightly older hardware, i have some corsair BH5 ram that i would like to run 1:1 with my cpu at 247fsb but it just refuses to go above 200 not matter what timings / voltages i give it... up to 3.2 v on my motherboard (1c7-max3) It even seems to especially...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.