Sure he is. He's done that kind of thing before. I'm not the one making that claim, it's been put forth by the lefties that he himself "leaked" the information. Either way, he comes out ahead, and the media (in this case madcow) has egg on her face.
What does any of this ranting and raving...
Again, logic: how does a ban on people from certain countries (ie, all the people, no matter the religion), and no ban on people from other countries with similar religious makeup constitute a ban on muslims??
Uh, because logically it isn't. There's nothing in the EO about religion...
Yet again, you misrepresent, and then argue with the misrepresentation. Congrats, at least you are consistent! :D
So.... that doesn't apply to you then?
I'm perfectly fine, thanks! What's funny is the guy who lives in the impenetrable lefty echo chamber bubble accusing others of living in...
Correct, our free speech rights don't extend to other countries. It's a valid observation though, that these countries with supposed free speech have criminalized criticism of groups based on feelings, so for all intents and purposes free speech is dead there.
So the actual regulations or EO's have nothing about religion nor any exemptions based on religions or specific targeting of religions. You're saying they are automatically still unconstitutional simply because of comments made prior. Does that mean no regulation could ever be constitutional...
So based on those comments and your logic, it would be essentially impossible for any regulations to be created that affects countries that have significant muslim populations. Even though the regulations have nothing in them about religion, affect people of all religions, do not affect other...
Once again, misrepresent and argue against your misrepresentation. Doesn't that shtick get old after a while for ya? ;) If you're naive enough to think ideology doesn't influence judicial review, that's up to you. Obviously wrong and silly, but you are entitled to your opinion. In this case...
There is nothing in the EO about religion at all. Going by this logic means you can't apply any kind of restrictions to immigration or travel from any countries because if they happen to be majority <insert group here> you'd have discrimination of that group. That's obvious BS. There's no way...
While I disagreed with the first block, since it was done (and upheld) by judges spanning the political spectrum, I view that as legitimate. In this case, all we have so far is a lib judge who in his ruling gets on his political soapbox to deliver a political "rebuke" of Trump -- in other...
Shocking, shocking I tell you, obummer lib nominee judge takes political stand in court. Who could have thought??
Good thing Trump is going to be making a lot of appointments, the leftist activist judges are out of control.
I don't get the conspiracy theory. If Trump intentionally leaked or planted the return, good for him, he punked madcow and a bunch of idiots and got tons of good pub. If he didn't release it and someone else did, good for him, he got good pub, it debunks the narrative of him not paying taxes...
Doesn't seem likely that the information is fake, it's just that she was dumb enough to get manipulated so easily by the "dumb" orange guy in the white house.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.