Recent content by Pcgeek09

Depends what your using it for. You can't simply say "it sucks".

hmm

Played all those games on the 8120... They worked perfectly

No I don't, that's ridiculous..i don't OC that much....

I dont even OC to that much, theres no reason to..

They arent bad chips, they just suck at overclocked power consumption, the clocks are not what they were supposed to be at and the architecture is more optimized for heavy multithreaded/multitasking. Lets hope FX2 will remedy the power consumption and up the IPC and clocks...

Why because it uses 4 modules? Module splitting is obviously performs better than hyper-threading..

1. I'm not trolling 2. Please link me to a site where they have updated it. It would be appreciated. 3. Do you own an 8 core?

@lonyo The FX 8150 oced to 8.4ghz

@Toyota Yeah and you think all those reviews are THAT accurate? Plus those reviews are from october. It doesn't even count anymore because they updated it.

I bought this processor and tbh, its working great for me. Its blazing fast and having no problems, especially when im running games and other applications. Microsoft also updated windows so now the FX can now support it which is a plus. So to the people who are still complaining, please...

I got a Asus EAH6570 with 1GB dedicated and i was wondering if i could run it on high or ultra on some settings? Specs: AMD 8 core 3.1ghz Ram: 8GB DDR3 Total video memory: 4855MB (4.8GB)

Which one has better core efficiency?

I just want something that will last a long time. Although, i heard that the FX is getting a major driver update in march and its full power will be unleashed. Its what i heard from AMD 2 months ago.

Im planning to build my own computer and im wondering, should i get a i5 or a amd fx?:confused: