OK, we're getting way off topic here. My fault. I was only trying to suggest a benchmarking tool. I should have titled this Media Encoding Performance: Benchmarking. I didn't intend for this to be a format comparison thread but rather a benchmarking suggestion for the reviewers. Here we have a...
Yeah, x264 is sweet! Unfortunately, my set top DVD player only does DIVX and DIVX Ultra (subtitles for a noisy room, yea!) so I just encode to DIVX for now.
Yes, 100% CPU usage. I just did a rough benchmark off the harddrive of 124 jpg files (it only works on jpg files)(151MB total) and it took 8min 15secs to compress down to 100MB. It took 7min 35sec to decompress. All the while at 95-100% CPU usage. To archive my 6GB camera CF card down to 4GB is...
I'm a new user of the format. I always beeline to the Media Encoding Performance section of the reviews of new CPUs and MBs whenever I'm planning on an upgrade. I do a lot of DIVX encoding as well so that review section is awesome, for me. Actually, I almost regret buying the program because it...
(I meant for this to be a suggestion for the AnandTech main site but posted it in forum suggestions in error)
It would be nice to see StuffIt 11 .jpg compression/decompression results in the Media Encoding Performance section of your reviews. It take FOREVER to compress/deconpress .jpg files...
It would be nice to see StuffIt 11 .jpg compression/decompression results in the Media Encoding Performance section of your reviews. It take FOREVER to compress/deconpress .jpg files but it compresses them almost 30% with no picture quality loss so I've been converting my .zip'd jpgs to .stix...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.