Indeed. R9700 will be a mix of perf stats. Upside of newer compute accelerators, alongside being capped by memory bandwidth. Gonna be interesting to see initial 3rd party numbers after embargo.
FP16 is usually the training territory.
On the inference side of things, it may be faster than XTX since RDNA4 now has dedicated hardware for computing FP8 and 4 times the throughput for INT4/8.
The majority of out-of-the-box inferencing models are served in INT8 or INT4 quantizations to reduce...
https://www.amd.com/en/blogs/2025/amd-radeon-ai-pro-r9700-to-be-available-in-workstation.html
1. 23rd July for R9700 included in solutions provided by System Integrators
2. Standalone AIB availability in later Q3 '25
You can switch down resolutions within games. Or use upscaling (FSR3/4) which essentially renders at lower resolution and then upscales to target 4k, gives performance boost while maintaining fedility.
I've spotted 3 AIB cards so far (for Radeon PRO AI R9700), and all of them have the 12-VHPWR (12V-2x6) connector.
- Gigabyte AI TOP
- Asrock
- PowerColor
Any hints/leaks/clues about Radeon PRO AI R9700 ???
(Also, I clearly remember announcements and news headlines quoting the card as W9700. When did it become R9700 :mad:)
Because compute-wise, it isn't flagship. I'm expecting up to a $1000 premium over standard 9070XT for double VRAM and "PRO" SKU segmentation/support. So $1500-1600?
(Edit: Also the benchmark numbers on slides were against 5080)
Might be a bit early here.
Running a Zen3 system in full hopium to finally upgrade with Zen6. I know it might be too much to ask for, but is there a post/thread that can TL;DR the discussion so far??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.