how are they making money in a way that is bad for the industry? According to many in here, they should be getting crushed by AMD bc of cinebench results? Maybe there is a misunderstanding between what actually drives purchases in the market vs the tech analysis people use in here?
you could say the same thing about cascade vs rome. the proof is in the pudding.
amd did like ~250mln of epyc revs in the quarter. In q3 they said 50% seq growth for epyc. In q4 they said "strong double digit". Why be vague?
Intel did 7.2bln of DCG revenue in Q4 and had asp up mid single...
intel is what you call "sandbagging" the 2h of the year. Its pretty obvious thats why the stock ripped. AMD on the other hand - looks like they lost server share in q4, and are set to lose pc share q4'19 to q1'20. Thats why the stock tanked.
Intel just posted record financial results
- 20.2bln of Q4'19 revenue, wall street expected 19.2bln
- Guided to 19bln of Q1'20 revenue, wall street expected $17.2
- DCG was up 19% yoy at 7.2bln, beating analyst esimates of 6.4bln
- CCG was at 10bln, beating analyst estimates of 9.74bln
- They...
thats not true. pc market grew in 2019 based on windows 7 eol support. If you look at last 5 years of data the desktop market shrunk considerably faster than the notebook market.
Maybe thats the case? It's the smallest market within the pc space and the one that is declining the fastest. Intel is capacity constrained.
A tick of the 9900k would be a pretty small die. Smaller than TGL-U for sure. I'm just trying to go through the thought processes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.