Recent content by kan3

orrrrrr you could do something different and make a server for 56k only, you'd always be full and you could get away with only 4kb/s upstream per user maybe even less :) just a thought

your dual 300a was doing them in 12 hours? hmm that seems alittle low...i had a PII 300 in linux doing it in 13ish and a single 300a@464 doing it in 12 if not less

hmm guess that means my pIII with 156fsb would cruise on a 56k hahaha funny stuff

you can grab the celeron 1.1A for that much

sigh, i bought this case but with the 300w PS from new egg about 2 1/2 monthes ago its an awesome case and i luv it my friend just bought this case but from another company and his was actual IBM black unlike mine with the off black/charcol

u can put any video card u want in it, it doesn't do x4 or fastwrite but thats not a big deal so go look at benchmarks

i had the same problem, i wanted to run dual P3 with etremely fast FSB but couldn't find a mb so i went with an i820 not as fast as a 440bx but they can be had for cheap(60$ for my asus pc3-d) and they can run very high fsb for overclocking i'm currently running 667@765 with 153fsb stable Rdram...

2 500's dont come close to 1000? the best thing about using dual cpu is not in thread programs designed for it but in a enviroment of heavy multitasking unacing a large file and watching a movie at the same time as well as running seti in the back ground in this kind of situation 2 500s get very...

win98 will always run your cpu at full load even for just idleing unlike win2k that seems to run it between 1-3% if your aren't doing anything

performance, and saving money to an extent :) i have a dual 300a@450 system cost me 45$ shipped for both cpus and they run as fast as PII 450..dual PII 450 would cost me bout 35$ more i also have a celeron 533a@896 , now if i had a 1.4 gig athlon would i oc' it ...ya :)

just wondering if this board performs as good as the upgraded apollo 133T chipsets looking for the better of the 2 for use with the new intel tualatins sis generally isn't the better performaner :)

infinity rates their subs rather poorly..350rms yes 1400w max..no maybe for 1 min 95% of all good manufactors(which they are considered to be) will not rate with a 1/4 peak ratio...we want to know what the "recommend" max power is not the absolute peak its also laughable as to how they rate...

this could be me but any intergrated chipset with vid/sound/lan that can play q3a outta the box with 1024x768 and get 50fps is good in my book only thing around are the crappy sis/intel all in one solutions for low level economy users now at atleast someone has something decent out that could...

for the 450$ of those speakers u could buy a decent reciever + 4 speakers