Recent content by jaredfs

Eat some protein to help it recover. If the pain doesn't eventually go away I guess you will have no choice but to get medical attention.

Yes, it's awesome that now 7 years later they came out with that report. There are still many more questions that need to be answered, though. If everything is clear, why don't you go through the Family Steering Committee's list of questions and submit the answers to them? You don't...

Here's an idea - read my actual posts instead of imagining I'm arguing something that I'm not. If you have a problem with a certain sentence I've posted, then get specific about that. You seem to be set on having an immature debate that goes nowhere, while I'm just making observations and...

Way to go! It's so cool to make fun of victim's family members!

'Cause you belong to the city You belong to the night Livin' in a river of darkness Beneath the neon lights You were born in the city Concrete under your feet

Yeah, it's not like the family group most responsible for there even being a 9/11 Commission, The Family Steering Committee, claims that only 30% of their questions were addressed by the 9/11 Commission. Oh wait : http://www.911independentcommission.org/questions.html Unanswered questions...

So not only can he sound like crap on cd, he can also do it live?!? Nah, he's ok I guess.

There are only a few known videos of the collapse and they are all from a good distance as that area was off limits. If you watch videos of actual controlled demolitions they don't sound much different than the WTC 7 collapse. Then there is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw...

1. Jesse Ventura spoke out in regards to 9/11. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZxacn4zkYc 2. Discussion then took place on a message board. Most of it is not worth your time reading, including what I've posted. 3. How about that Michael Phelps?

Everything you quoted pertains to the towers (buildings 1 and 2). The only comment I know of from NIST in regards to explosives in building 7 is : "NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no...

OK, I'll take a shot at your questions just for the heck of it... 1. The terrorists mission is to spread terror, panic, etc. WTC 7 went down at 5:20 pm - peak drive time for radio. People are looking forward to going home and relaxing and then they are hit with news of another building...

That's because as I originally pointed out, they spent zero time even considering explosives as a possibility. It's sad when your average CSI investigation is more in depth. They are suppose to be releasing another report on WTC 7 sometime here, though.

I have not blasted this report. What is hilarious is that you think you know exactly what happened while the experts hired by the government admit they aren't sure. I think you need to reread it. They make it clear that the WTC 2 collapse did not do any known significant damage to WTC 7...

"the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence" Those are the words of the government's experts. They don't sound so sure to me.

Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy...