Huge price drop on the Ceton INFINITV4 (was $400)
eBay link removed
great deal for someone that currently rents cable boxes.
No links to eBay allowed. It doesn't matter if it's an auction or a buy-it-now item
esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
Board is designed by Intel, manufactured by Foxconn.
The Intel 65W spec is for ITX systems, but the board itself is 100% able to support 95W sandy bridge CPUs.
Intel's boards are typically the most power efficient because they are designed to be. The DH67CF is not designed to be...
The intel board is actually really nice (in terms of efficiency). Since you can't overclock it, might as well save some $ on electric.
14.1 watts @ idle with i3-2100T (http://www.missingremote.com/review/intel-core-i3-2100t-and-bh67cf-mini-itx-motherboard)
I would recommend you go with the DH67CF from Intel.
If you are going to use it for a HTPC, the Intel board has a standard CIR header port, which is a nice bonus.
The main difference is the power consumption of the DH67CF...
It would be nice if you compared it to the Acer AS1830T-3505 (i3-330UM).
At ~$450-500 it's about the same price point, same size screen, similar specs, etc.
Why wouldn't you compare these?
oh that sucks
yeah definitely another reason not to go raid (yet)
I like the expandability, personally.
by the time I fill up my 80gb, a 2nd 80gb will be much cheaper and intel will hopefully have trim and raid play nice together
I've installed 80GB G2 in raid0 and just 80GB stand alone... on paper, it may seem much faster, but real world doesn't make a HUGE difference - you probably wouldn't even notice unless you are doing very data-intense stuff like photoshop, etc. Gaming, 1ssd will be great.
What I would do is go...
Not sure why anyone would buy this... Western Digital needs to look at reality.
They would have been better off just using the proven indilinx barefoot controller.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820250001
$249 for 64GB
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820250002...
what do you mean handpicked? Crucial doesnt handpick these. A machine bins them to 1.8ns.
A machine picks the best of the best lol.
Cheex, to answer your questions-
1) Many would actually prefer the D9DQW, it is known as "fatbody". It is the older rev D9 that came before D9GMH...
im still confused how people can say that it is up in the air which one is faster.
There are 100's of benchmarks already by guys like you and me to confirm this.
Search around on the net for a while. You will find them everywhere.
Anything and everything I am saying has nothing to do with what anand said about conroe a long time ago. That article was worthless. I dont understand why you guys are debating an article that is just a grain of rice in a big pot.
The CPU doesnt shine until it is overclocked anyway.
I recommend an E6600
You will be able to overclock it between 3-4 ghz.
It is the amd athlon 64 x2 4400/opteron 165 of intel
cheapest model with 4mb of cache, and overclocks VERY well.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.