You gotta keep inmind that some people are all about benchmark scores.............. This is where the higher rated memory shines... Theres no doubt that in real world application the difference is minimal....
THe review clearly shows that the DDR 600 outperforms DDR400 memory.... Thats a given... Major flaw in the comparision chart is that they dont have a DDR500 2-2-2 comparison which is much more common for overclockers using BH-5/UTT Ram.
All applications can take advantage of 1mb of Cache over 5412k.
Thats just a bigger chunk of data the CPU can process from its memory.
Since 3700's are clocking just as high, if not higher, than a 3800, the 300+ wins hands down. No "Rumor" needed.
WHere Have I been? AMD world mostly.... Just built my Intel rig a few weeks ago.....
I didnt expect much from the game benchmarks or even superpi.... But I thought PCMark04 would be insane high.....
I must say the email correspondece between myself and Monarch has been dismal. I placed my Order on 4/27, changed it on 5/2 and since monday, been sending emails trying to get my status with NO LUCK. Today I called them and spoke to Jerremy and he took care of me big time. Dint even have to...
Your not using the Motherboard header to power those fans are you? THe larger fans need to be powered by a PSU lead... Otherwise youcan easily overload the motherboard power connector and cause the fan tospin slow and/or stop.
Just called Monarch and got my order al straightend out... My 3000+ Should be on its way shortly ad a 3700+ when they come in.... AND a DFI 865PE-Tag for my Intel rig........ Ended up sending them a bit more of my money... But thats ok.........
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.