Recent content by ilyal

Aspect's experiment that refutes Bell's inequality consists of measuring spins at various angles on two beams of entangled particles. But apparently, according to "Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volt. III, page 6-14, table 6-2, Rye(Φ)", measurements of spins on a single beam of particles...

hi, i was wondering why is it that many protocols transmit hex values in coded in ascii? it seems very wasteful, you use 8-bits of data to transmit 4 bits, and i doubt its useful for reliability, i'm pretty sure that just sending the data twice is more robust. the only advantage i can see...

yes, but my question is: is there is a proof for the following statement: or rather it is a kind of axiom?

hi, after reading http://www.theculture.org/rich...e/archives/000089.html i got curious is there actully someting in relativity that forbids absolute time? or is it just ugly becuse it ruins the Symmetry between inertial frames of references? is it possiable that instantaneous...

ok, thx, that make alot more since, now, can you please explain why the situation is different for visible light? or if it isn't, why we don't see the stars jumping in the sky?

the start location is the location of the particale at t =0 (and t =2 its the same location), x=0 the end of the path is the location of the particatle at t=1, x=0.5c * 1 = 0.5c the point p is not along the path, its offset by 3*c from both the start point and the end point, all the three...

what transformation do i need to do? the point p frame and the lab frame where the description of the motion is given are in the same refernce frame, they are only distant from each other. can you also please describe how you think the motion would look like from point p? i am sorry...

im taking a physics cource, and we were given the following question: suppose there is a charge, whose notion is as follows: from t=0 to t=1 it moves at 0.5c, then from t=1 to t=2 it moves at -0.5c the motion is describied with the following graph: the y axis is location and x axis is...