Recent content by Gautam B

Dude, you got a monster on your hands. I got my mobile 3000+ to hit 2.8GHz on air for some benchmarking, and 2.7GHz daily stable. And at the same time more or less matched the performance of the Winchesters/Venices. The cache really is worth a lot on socket 754.

If I patched, I'd be in the 23 or 24 sec range....I don't do patched scores. SuperPI mod 1.4, uncheatable version. That's all I run, and IMHO, it's all anyone should run, instead of all of these versions that tamper with the original program. It's point is to be free of software optimizations...

I did two posts up link is here again, 25m 29 sec. My A64 3000+ 754 Clawhammer did it in 27' 29" at 2.75GHz. Both with 512 megs of memory. (nearly a 30 second penalty) :( btw, just about every number in MBM5 is way out of whack.

I don't know where the 3.4 gigs came from exactly...Aquamark3 is just weird like that. But I did show that my 2.67 gig Dothan is equivalent to a 2.9 gig San Diego.

Wasn't aware of this but thanks for pointing it out...no need to get so jumpy about it. Here's my 32m test; still compares to an A64 San Diego at about 2.9GHz.

Reading some of this stuff just makes me want to kill Intel's management. They had a potential A64 killer about 3 years...why didn't it see the light of day? Because of RDRAM...[rolls eyes] You are correct about the Dothan not benefitting from greater memory bandwidth. It interestingly...

Hi folks, those results are mine. I believe that the Dothan has a pipeline stage length of either 14 or 15, compared to the Athlon64's 12. It's raw IPC, as a consequence, is actually lower than the Athlon64. It's performance in raw integer calculation, as tested by the Sandra Arithmetic test and...