Recent content by Flankerspanker

Hmm.. does this mean that the uncertainty about use with future 1333FSB-native quad-cores is now resolved? Or, will using those processors require overclocking the chipset, and advanced cooling hardware?

Pardon me - you're sure? Or the author of the preview is sure, and I've just misunderstood/misread him? Because from the comment: "we consider it to be a problem when the boards will not reach at least 333FSB. The reason for this is that the upcoming 1333FSB (Quad Pumped) quad core...

A nice preview article and, despite the delays, worth waiting for. I found the information I was looking for on Page 4: "Although the board is touted as being 'Quad-Core optimized', we did not see it. " and Page 9: "While most people would not be too worried about this or might simply...

Ok, so bottom line if I want to buy a board & processor now, and then later drop-in upgrade to a new quad-core "1333FSB" processor without having to know anything about overclocking, then the Striker is still the better choice? Tangentially... (noob mode on) (1) What do the words "native,"...

Hmm... Thanks for the reply but I'm afraid it doesn't really answer my question. Specifically, in an earlier message Gary says "1333 works" but now he says quad-core overclocked to "325FSB Max" - am I msunderstanding something? Is "1333FSB" only supposed to be an attribute of single-core...

Hello, Ok can someone explain to a noob how this works? Isn't this board supposed to support 1333FSB in native mode? How does "325" count as "overclocking?" I'm looking for a board that will support 1333FSB when running with the future Intel quad-core, without any overclocking. What...