I think AMD said that FSR4's model already takes from both CNNs and transformers. There's room for improvement with future updates for sure, I hope they inch closer to DLSS4.
Solid effort from AMD. Nvidia is still ahead, but they’re more competitive than they’ve been in forever without relying on a node advantage as a crutch.
Maybe they are, but either way, different designs can have massive differences in transistor counts despite having a similar die size using a similar node. “Performance per transistor” is a meaningless and irrelevant thing.
How will it be slower in RT?
20% slower in RT? Yes, and more in Nvidia PT tech demos. In most hybrid rendered games with lighter RT, probably not if AMD is to be believed.
Making yourself look favorable by pricing your GPUs into oblivion isn't what AMD wants, presumably. Of course, they could go for a far less extreme version of that and offer compelling value at $599 while still making okay money, as you said, but I think Timorous is right that that would barely...
Doubt FSR4 will get close to DLSS4. It’ll probably catch up to DLSS3 at best and most people will then say that they’re buying Nvidia because DLSS4 is better, among many other must-have Nvidia exclusive features.
I think DLSS4 is great, but I doubt that Radeon’s sales would improve much even...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.