they shouldnt be...what did they expect?...this is the fastest single gpu solution by far...better IQ...better power consumption + it will only get better with future driver releases
you and me and everyone who has read the forums more than once know that it is not what he is doing...you can try to convince people untill you are blue (green?) in the face, but thats the exact reason i quoted that one conversation he had with sickbeast, just so people can see his...
guys...just ignore OCguy and keysplayer...they are just here to do their worst and try to trash ati cards as much as they can
sorry to do this but this is representative enough:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: SickBeast
IMO it's...
will they finally fix the absurd situation where 2 gpu in sli + 1 separate physx card outperforms 3 gpu in sli when physx is enabled :D
"By now you should all know that PhysX is here to stay and considering the list of games which will be released in the coming months with PhysX support, we...
what? and nvidia users do not get an explanation why is there so poorly implemented technology that punishes triple sli users who bought their hardware for the sole reason to have the fastest VGA system on the planet, and now to get the best performance, they have to disable one of ther...
im sure its best for you to hide from this, unless you think that this pathetic try to change the subject and ignore the facts presented will help your cause
lets see:
it is a fact what i said before that physx does need a separate card to run to the full capability...furthermore it is just...
what you need to do, again, is go back and read what i said...you seem to be good in going back and finding things...use it again this time...you will see that what i said is that Physx needs to be run on a separate card to get max performance, because it slows the main card down...to what i got...
LOL you just got owned...unless, and i ask again, you can show separate vga cards that run exclusively AA, AF, depth, shaderQ, like it can happen with physx
is this sinking to a new low for you? you are actually comparing AA, AF to Physx? im sorry to say but you are losing it in your attempts to justify this...unless you can show us where AA or AF can be run on a separate nvidia card :)
its just your squirming that is getting worse...or are you saying that once there is max stress on the GPU for 3D, the physx capability do not suffer a hit?
hehe i forgot to mention this... i tried the glasses for like 3 minutes and couldnt see straight for a few hours...i felt like i was gonna have seizure or something...ofc its not nvidias fault, but the store clerk who set it to 100% right off the bat.
well you call it childish when it doesnt fit you, i call it logical that you will try to defend nvidia by any means possible, since they are the ones providing you the latest hardware that is otherwise expensive as hell if one wants to keep up...
again, i am not mad at nvidia for disabling...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.