Recent content by cybercham

I play UT without any problems on my Radeon and I've got the large texture patch installed. The only feature of hyper-z that's not fully supported yet is hierarchical z and that should be fixed shortly. It causes corruption in certain games at this point.

"Honestly, Radeon vs. GeForce 256 DDR, the GeForce would be noticablely faster in most games. " Sorry but the only card I've seen that's faster than the Radeon is the GTS.

Radeon.

I love my Radeon. One of the things people keep talking about are bad drivers. IMO thats a thing of the past with ATi. Here's a little story to show you what happens and how people blame "driver problems" for everything. I have Homeworld: Cataclysm. From day one I was unable to...

Radeon.

I'm using Lightspeeds tweaked drivers for win98 and they're excellent. Improves on the already excellent image quality.

I love my Radeon 32 DDR too. Have you tried Lightspeed's latest drivers for win98? The image quality is even better than before. Amazing.

Definitely the Radeon. I had the Fury and there is simply no comparison between the two.

Bozack, We have the same system. I just got the 32 meg DDR Radeon for my c466 on a bh-6 rev. 1.01 and I'm thinking just about the same thing for my next processor. I think we could probably get away with putting a p3 700 on there though don't you think? I know the board only...

Keep in mind that the MX only has 2 pixel rendering pipelines as opposed to the GTS's 4.

Get the 32meg DDR retail if that's what you want it for. Go to the stores with the $50 rebate.

I know what you're saying! I just got the same card to replace my Fury and it's giving me double the performance (at least) that I had before. For $150 you can't beat it.