CouncilorIrissa's latest activity
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to gdansk's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with
Like.
No, because they are ahead in process yet behind in result. That's categorical. AMD is behind in process and behind in result. That is... -
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to Doug S's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
Wow you compare something with 10 cores (many of them E cores) with something that has 16 cores and we're supposed to be impressed that...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to Doug S's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
What's wrong with Asahi? Yes it doesn't fully support every bit of hardware on ARM Macs, or full GPU acceleration, but it is more than...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to johnsonwax's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
Except you weren't decoding the video on the CPU on x86, you were decoding it in custom silicon that the M1 possibly didn't have...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to johnsonwax's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
They're not your mommy. $94B in revenue last quarter. Since you don't even seem to know what codec was causing the problem, who's to...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to johnsonwax's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
I think we need to be a bit clearer on what we mean here. x86 exists to serve one, potentially two markets - consumer PCs/servers...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to gdansk's post in the thread Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads with Like.
No, go read a Microprocessor Report from back then. Speed demons kept winning in the late 90s so Intel/IBM doubled down on it. They did...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to adroc_thurston's post in the thread Question Zen 6 Speculation Thread with Like.
It's a completely different microarch so any power estimates are worthless.
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to gdansk's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
Indeed. But I noted my personal preference for a reason. I do not wank to efficiency charts. The reason I like M1 and M4 is because they...
-
CCouncilorIrissa replied to the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread..1t perf/w is still quite a bit better on SDXE iirc, it's just that it has not much else going its way. (also you need a unicorn in 80/84100)
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to Doug S's post in the thread Question x86 and ARM architectures comparison thread. with Like.
That's really a minor thing. It used to be a much bigger deal when your transistors numbered in the low millions like in the Pentium...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to MS_AT's post in the thread Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000) with Like.
Sustained clocks should be higher. Just compare on Epyc...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to adroc_thurston's post in the thread Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000) with Like.
numbers in a vacuum that have no relation to modern DTCO'd to hell designs
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to StefanR5R's post in the thread Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000) with Like.
Keep in mind that TSMC provides such figures for certain ARM cores ARM IP on the vanilla process. AMD has got AMD cores, and DTCO is at...
-
CCouncilorIrissa reacted to inquiss's post in the thread Question AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9000 “Shimada Peak” spotted with 32 and 64 Zen5 cores with Like.
16c AMD sales make up less than 1% of desktop DIY AMD sales. So no, I'm not joking, I'm being serious. It's a niche part of the market...
Facebook
Twitter