Nehalem was demoed in a 2-socket class motherboard using Tylersburg chipset as per in IDF. So two that was highlight during the demo. The health of Nehalem which is 3 weeks old and their new Tylersburg chipset.
No news on desktop in IDF
yes something like 3DNow. I love AMD to participate in any of this development initiatives but naming SSE5? tsk tsk tsk
And why cant they have this backward compatible? It will be very very confusing to software developers. Likewise if Intel will release SSE5 before AMD now what?
what if Intel will release SSE5 in Nehalem processor? I gues they will have since its a new architecture..... My take SSE is already for Intel although they are open standard. AMD should name it otherwise and prove to the industry that what they develop is worthwhile. This is to avoid confusion...
why is AMD blaming Intel as always when they are having problems on their execution? Like this one
``If we're going to implement an asset light strategy, I don't know if we can have sole ownership of anything,'' he said when asked if Advanced Micro will continue to be the only owner of its...
I wonder how will Henri Richards react on this? He's so quiet lately unlike when AMD had its best time. He would always comment against Intel every often. :D
I seriously believe that there is a problem with Barcelona. I tend to agree with Anand that AMD's excuses of not giving any information/benchmarks is because thay dont want Intel to react. Why would they give preview of their mobile processor where they should have done it with Barcelona? Last...
not to be bias with Intel or AMD but honestly AMD is also using flawed benchmarks in their website when comparing Core vs Athlon. I'm not sure whether someone here notice it.
I've been reading most of your post Viditor and I'm almost certain that you tend to side more or bias to AMD than with Intel although making PD of owning Intel stocks doesn't change with what our views here.
Anyway, I think eventhough Penryn doesn't have any architectural improvement vs C2D...
Another advantage on Intel is its 45nm is socket compatible with current mobo. Although AMD quad is also socket compatible, I think they need new mobo to fully exploit its potentials like the PLL per core etc etc. Its an interesting battle come 2H. We know Penryn core's only survival is if it...
I've read that AMD got a substantial market share increase in Mobile processor front vs Intel. I'm somewhat puzzled since product per product what Intel are offering right now is pretty good as compared to Turion or other mobile derivative of AMD. How can this be? The way I see fom review, some...
In my opinion AMD got really really lazy when they had the K8 lead. Come to think of it, they have around 3 years of uncontested lead and they just thought Intel is sitting around. They must have anticipated then that Intel will release new architecture which they have design newer architecture...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.