Recent content by adroc_thurston

That's not how any of that works.

You gotta hide latency somehow you know.

She loves saying "Leadership %stuff%" more than anyone else in the industry. Fortunately, they actually have a product that does that. Which brings us to the Intel problem: they can't execute. Time and time again, CEO after CEO they've been struggling to keep foundry and IP roadmaps going.

They don't because AMD SIMD implementation is world-class.

Yeah. It's always cclk for the ring. There is no 'ratio', that's Intel gibberish.

47 cycles (i.e. it's the same).

No. Just forget about Xbox or whatever.

Yeah that's called launching a new product in a new swimlane. You need to stuff the channel to force enough units into driving per-unit cost down.

US is an honorary Eastern Euro country now. It's not supposed to make sense. Just enjoy the ride (till it crashes and burns).

it is a tongfang chassis lmao. It's a Tongfang chassis sold for thin margins. AMD is trying to stuff the channel with -halo to make per-unit costs a lot more palatable across the stack.

the law does not exist in the US anymore

Oh no the statement is wrong, 18A was derisked in multiple steps. Intel just kinda sucks. ding-ding-ding, it's been a yield struggle session ever since 7LPP.

Idk what was that but yeah, 18A stinks on all levels so far.

I think they just need to execute on at least a single node well and oh boy turns out 18A is NOT THAT

Yeah that's like the funniest part. Packaging is a low margin business. What you want is to fab stuff, and Intel can't.