Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 318 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kaffeekenan

Member
Jan 6, 2022
33
29
61
So, what is our consensus as far as Arrow Lakes competitiveness is concerned? Zen 5 seems to be a really nice chip and many people believe, that there will be a rather huge performance bump. Will it be enough to clearly defeat Arrow Lake or will it be a close fight. I tend towards a close fight, maybe in slight favor of Zen5. Any thoughts? :)
 

deasd

Senior member
Dec 31, 2013
520
763
136
This time maybe if you can cool it well enough, it will scale?
Assuming Zen5 core is 50% larger than Zen4, heat density could be unleashed quite a bit. If Zen5 DT strategy is the same as Zen4 which tend to push silicon close to its limitation, I guess it could push higher with Zen5.
But is this 8-core thing indeed Granite Ridge? Any chance it could be 8-core EPYC Turin?
 

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,123
2,629
136
So, what is our consensus as far as Arrow Lakes competitiveness is concerned? Zen 5 seems to be a really nice chip and many people believe, that there will be a rather huge performance bump. Will it be enough to clearly defeat Arrow Lake or will it be a close fight. I tend towards a close fight, maybe in slight favor of Zen5. Any thoughts? :)
I suspect some of the X3D parts will be quite desirable. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek
Jul 27, 2020
16,340
10,352
106
I’m assuming it’s not final specs or a typo. That’d mean that the 9950X power draw would exceed AM5 limitation of 230W.
Either 9950X's cores have to make do with reduced power within the 230W PPT limit or AMD mandates the OEMs to release special mobos that provide higher power than that. Maybe AM5+?
 

Joe NYC

Golden Member
Jun 26, 2021
1,970
2,342
106
Isn't that obvious.

I would not put it past the AMD marketing, which is the weakest link in the AMD chain.

Introduce 8 core Zen 5 as 9800X at $499, and within weeks allowed it to be discounted at $399.
As opposed to calling it 9700X at $399 and try to maintain the MSRP at $399.

Or is anybody really fooled when they buy a processor at $399, when it says $100 off, from $499?
 

adroc_thurston

Platinum Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,219
2,936
96
I would not put it past the AMD marketing, which is the weakest link in the AMD chain.
Marketing doesn't call prices much.
They do, well, marketing.
Introduce 8 core Zen 5 as 9800X at $499, and within weeks allowed it to be discounted at $399.
They don't have to.
It can be $549 and people would still evaporate it off the shelves.
As opposed to calling it 9700X at $399 and try to maintain the MSRP at $399.
9700X just won't exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe NYC

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
663
540
106
Isn't that obvious.
No, I still think AMD will maintain current pricing and dropping Zen4 to sub-$200 level. Let's put in the table below:

6 core8 core12 core16 core
Zen 3$299$449$549$799
Zen 4$299$399$549$699
Zen 5 (adroc)$549$999

DIY market is not exactly growing. That's why AMD has dropped the price of 7950X from $799 to $699. And in case you didn't know, AMD's client PC revenue has dropped from $6.8 billion (2022) to $6.2 billion....

If you think AMD will increase the prices of Zen5, give me your price and I will update the table for you...and bookmark it.
 
Last edited: