Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > General Hardware

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2007, 05:56 PM   #1
imported_nunya
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 612
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

A few months ago I picked up 3 Seagate 400GB drives when Fry's was letting them go for dirt cheap. A couple of weeks ago the price dropped again so I picked up a fourth. I'd had the first 3 running in a RAID 5 on my DFI NF4 board, and just dumped everything on them to external and added the fourth HD to the raid. Performance seemed very reasonable when I only had the 3 drives but now that I've added the fourth it seems extremely slow. Copying about 400GB back to the raid took around 8-9 hours from a 500GB external. Copying another 100GB over my 100mb network also seemed to take a really long time. Additionally, when I right click and hit properties to check how much space is being used by the folders that hold my music and movies it takes a long time to count it all up, about a minute compared to 10-15 seconds on my other machine that has the same data stored on just 1 drive. The machines are virtually the same, Opteron 165 and DFI NF4 SLI-DR boards in both, Seagate 400GB 7200.10 drives. I expected some overhead from the RAID but not this much, and I didn't expect adding another drive to impact the performance like it has, so I'm wondering if I should buy a discrete RAID controller. Of course, this is basically just a fileserver for my media so I'm not looking to spend hundreds of dollars on it, maybe a hundred or so tops. Is there a RAID card in my price range that would give me better performance or should I just suck it up and leave it be?
imported_nunya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2007, 06:09 PM   #2
RebateMonger
Super Moderator
Elite Member
 
RebateMonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tempe, Arizona, USA
Posts: 11,592
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

I think it's pretty well accepted that running RAID5 without a dedicated CPU (an add-in RAID 5 card with processor and memory) is really SLOW. If speed is important, don't do RAID 5 or get a dedicated RAID card.

There are PCI/PCI-E/PCI-X cards with CPUs and memory starting around $175 and up. I'm not sure if I'd really recommend anything that's less than $300 (low-end 3Ware), though. A lot of the cheaper ones have issues with "losing drives" and such. If you don't mind supporting such problems (which YOU may not have at all), then you could consider a $200 or so HighPoint SATA card.
__________________
MCSE:Security:2003 - MCTS:SBS 2008 - Arizona's 1st Microsoft Small Business Specialist
--- In loving memory of my beautiful Australian Shepherd, Skye. July 2001-January 2010 ---
War on Terror 2000-2010 ~ Terrorist-caused Deaths < 10,000 ~ Bush's Wars > 1,000,000 ~ Winning?
RebateMonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2007, 10:21 PM   #3
Madwand1
Diamond Member
 
Madwand1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,291
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

I've seen similar behavior with nForce 430 -- 3-drive RAID 5 is fast for writes (with 32k stripe size, created via BIOS), but 4-drive RAID 5 is always slow, regardless of stripe size. My best guess is that there's some simple optimization that works fine for the 3-drive case, but doesn't for 4 drives. However, I haven't tried your version, so there's a small chance that some other stripe size would restore your performance. I suggest 16k.

Highpoint 23xx series cards perform much better than the slow version of nvRAID, and aren't very expensive.

Good, cheap, fast. Pick two?
Madwand1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 06:48 PM   #4
imported_nunya
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 612
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

Thanks for the input, it's what I needed. I may try to pick up one of those Highpoint controllers and see how it works out.
imported_nunya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 02:27 AM   #5
integramodder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

Do you guys have any experience with RAID 5 on the Intel P965 chipsets?

I bought a PB5 Deluxe last month and how that I can get decent 500GB drives for 100 bucks I'm thinking of getting 4 and getting rid of my various drives.
integramodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 10:24 PM   #6
Madwand1
Diamond Member
 
Madwand1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,291
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

I've used RAID 5 on a similar chipset -- Q965, and it's been pretty good -- decent sequential read/writes when measured locally.

At this time, I think the Highpoint 23xx is a bit better, especially in terms of the feature set, but for on-board, I think it's about as good as it gets (perhaps short of ICH9R).
Madwand1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 10:38 AM   #7
Quasmo
Diamond Member
 
Quasmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cumming.
Posts: 9,630
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

I've done alot of research on this (I had to setup a raid5 for video editing) We started out using onboard nvRAID and performance was terrible, it's literally software raid. So we ended up having to get a dedicated card, even though you don't need it, for those popping into this thread for information, the best card I found with 8 ports was the Areca 1220 PCI-E card, it is lightning quick. Areca makes an awesome raid controller, you might look into their 4 port card the 1210, I dont know if it's in your price range though.
__________________
www.willifit.com
Quasmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 04:15 PM   #8
integramodder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Default Onboard vs. Discrete Raid Controller For Raid 5

This will be used to store movies, music, tv shows and software. I wont really need crazy performance, so hopefully the onboard will be enough for me.
integramodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.